Why is being a dick for no reason not as backlashy as being respectful for no reason?
If someone has to earn respect then they should also have to earn hatred too.
Okay, I am going to make this clear right now, I AM NEUTRAL ON GAMERGATE. If you supported or hated it then whatever, both sides had some points but I will not hate/like you just because of your stance. I just find it idiotic how almost everyone involved on both sides overreacted to the extreme...
Did you not read the comment? I am not stating my stance on the Gamergate debacle, only how everyone and their mother reacted to it. Regardless of how you viewed it, you can't deny it started a controversy that overall divided a lot of the Internet community as a whole. Last time I checked...
Okay.
Best case scenario: This whole thing blows over and everyone calms the heck down until the next hot controversial topic shows up.
Worst case scenario: Another full blown internet-wide Gamergate Journalism outrage just like in 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X4IChfMb64&t=
Even though everyone here came to a general agreement of "yeah the people attacking him and the people defending him are both half right and wrong", i'll leave this video here anyway.
I won't use Sega as an example of a company that doesn't mind/supports fangames due to the "LOL THERE SO BROKE THEY TAKE WHAT THEY CAN GET" argument everyone loves to use. Instead I will use a company in a much better position, Valve. Look at all the hacks, fangames, mods, straight up remakes...
How many topics do you have to disagree on with someone before you can say "screw them and their thoughts"?
:posh:
In the past 3 years the only things I was ever in agreement with Jim on was #*bleep*onami and those *bleep* brothers that dumped all their garbage games on Steam.
Yeah, I ain't watching that guy. I have my reason for disliking and avoiding his content. But if whatever he says is something you can agree then that's fine. Also, I said murder (killing in cold intentional blood, not every kill is on purpose and therefore is not always a murder) is an issue...
For example, issues such as murder, alcoholism, and corruption will be poked fun at while drug abuse, rape, racism are put in a serious light. It's as if their saying, "Hey this one issue you think is serious is pretty funny" while they pussy out and say to another topic "This is a really bad...
Well, it's apparent something has happened, what I'm worried about is how will this whole social debacle blow over or at the very least quiet down before people start killing each other?
Cynics are grumpier, wimps are more whiny, terrorists have tripled their lust for bloodshed, authorities are more censorship happy, and average everyday joes seem to be a thing of the past. Is it just me?
:mario:
With all the coins he collects on a journey suddenly disappearing in the next game it makes ya wonder what the hell he spends it all on in-between games?
Like where a guy you face in the middle of the game poses a bigger threat and has a greater importance to the story than the main big baddie at the end? Imagine a game where Bowser is a boss at the start or middle and the real final boss is some generic bad guy who comes out of ducking nowhere.
How could a animated series about the chubby plumber be written in a way that can provide good story without having Mario or anyone else saying a single word? :???: