Issue LVI

What would you rate it?

  • 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • 8

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • 9

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • 10

    Votes: 3 27.3%

  • Total voters
    11

Marioguy1

Leo
Chat Administrator
Retired Wiki Staff
So, how would you rate this issue?
 
10/10 (aside from the missing Interview section)

I was impressed with a lot of the articles and found them a pleasure to read.
 
Everyone knows my section is the best part of this issue and every upcoming issue ever.

(also, really glad MCD won Section of the Month)
 
Ned Kelly said:
Everyone knows my section is the best part of this issue and every upcoming issue ever.

(also, really glad MCD won Section of the Month)

Yours was one of my favorites.
 
D'aww, thanks guys. :)

I'd rate this a nine, because I thought this was actually a pretty good issue. Despite the currently missing Fake Ads and Interview, the sections were all of a great quality.
 
I'd give it a 9.5/10, deducting points for missing sections and mentioning UM.

My favorite section was the Non-Marioverse review, probably because of the style in its writing.
 
I thought this was quite a weak Issue. I gave it 7.
 
Skull Kid said:
I thought this was quite a weak Issue. I gave it 7.
Nabber said:
Yeah, it was kind of meh.
Epic Nitwit said:
Well, I didn't read much, but the fake news wasn't that good, and I didn't read much else.
Because you didn't read my section, peons! If you had, you would rate every issue 10/10 forever and ever.
 
I skimmed it. I was okay, I guess, but it's kind of hard to be excited by a review unless you want to read it.
 
Ned Kelly said:
Skull Kid said:
I thought this was quite a weak Issue. I gave it 7.
Nabber said:
Yeah, it was kind of meh.
Epic Nitwit said:
Well, I didn't read much, but the fake news wasn't that good, and I didn't read much else.
Because you didn't read my section, peons! If you had, you would rate every issue 10/10 forever and ever.

Well, I looked at the introduction of yours. Lots of aussie talk there.
 
Epic Nitwit said:
Ned Kelly said:
Skull Kid said:
I thought this was quite a weak Issue. I gave it 7.
Nabber said:
Yeah, it was kind of meh.
Epic Nitwit said:
Well, I didn't read much, but the fake news wasn't that good, and I didn't read much else.
Because you didn't read my section, peons! If you had, you would rate every issue 10/10 forever and ever.

Well, I looked at the introduction of yours. Lots of aussie talk there.
I looked at the introduction; I was hooked from that point on.
 
Gave it an 8 out of 10.

MBV's section gets a 10, though.
 
Back