Sudden Influx of Unnecessary Smileys

[RandomYoshi]

As you have probably noticed, the amount of smileys has sky-rocketed during the course of this week. Before, it seems like smileys haven't been added that easily. The normal smileys we have, such as , and :D, are all designed with the same purpose in mind: simplifying means of discussion when you want to express a feeling. For instance, if I post something happy, I am inclined to type ":)", which makes "", a happy face. However, if I have to post something sad, I would type ":(" instead, which makes "". With all of the above being said, I have one question to you all, when the hell are you going to use them, and for what purposes?

 

[NSY]

Oh god, I agree with this so much.

Please sticky.

 

[Tyrell Badd]

I'm fine with smileys that relate to the Mario series in some way, but stupid shit like :cube:, , and take things too far.

Edit: lol at trickster being barkley

 

[NSY]

Yeah those should be deleted.

:drosh: :kirby: :Samus: also need to go. Also the joke similes are like the joke ranks like honk. and scorpion king.

 

[Ray Trace]

I'm fine with smileys that relate to the Mario series in some way, but stupid *bleep* like :cube:, , and take things too far.

I agree with this. This is a Mario-themed forum after all, we should have smileys of some of the major characters in the series. Though I do think the more obscure ones such as or are a little too far (then again, we do have )

 

[Cirdec]

Wait why trickster Mario has changed to Barkley?

 

[RandomYoshi]

In general, I think that because Porple has been very lenient with what to add, people have just leached onto his generosity, subsequently becoming "Smiley Greedy", so then even more get added. God, for merely an hour ago, I decided to go buy myself a hamburger at my local grill, which is five minutes away from where I live, and also purchase some candy. All of this took about thirty minutes, and when I returned I see about five, six new smileys added. Will this forum explode in smileys? At this pace, it probably will.

 

[NSY]

I mean he will expect porn as simile soon.

Yeah I think we should start a petition against these.

 

[Smashley]

I'm fine with smileys that relate to the Mario series in some way, but stupid shit like :cube:, , and take things too far.

I agree with this. I'm fine with most of the Mario smileys (though some of the more obscure ones might not be needed), and even things like Kirby and Samus I don't really have a problem with, but I find the three you posted to be kind of unnecessary.

 

[Ray Trace]

Barkely doesn't even have good transparency anyway

In general, I think that because Porple has been very lenient with what to add, people have just leached onto his generosity, subsequently becoming "Smiley Greedy", so then even more get added. God, for merely an hour ago, I decided to go buy myself a hamburger at my local grill, which is five minutes away from where I live, and also purchase some candy. All of this took about thirty minutes, and when I return I see about five, six new smileys added. Will this forum explode in smileys? At this pace, it probably will.

I haven't leeched to his generosity, I've made some like Baby Mario and Baby Luigi years ago and they haven't been added. The Mario-related ones are fine; we are a Mario forum, things like Diddy Kong should have been added much earlier.

 

[NSY]

Kirby and Samus should go, there non-Mario and one is ugly as hell.
:pyro: should go as well.
is also ugly.

I might even consider dk2 going as well.

 

[EctoBiologist]

I don't like

it's on the wrong code and it doesn't have transparency.

 

[Superchao]

I might even consider dk2 going as well.

 

[Ray Trace]

Kirby and Samus should go, there non-Mario and one is ugly as hell.
:pyro: should go as well.
is also ugly.

I might even consider dk2 going as well.

Do you realize who made the Sh Guy sprite? Or do you want me to call you out?

And why do you want Baby Luigi to go? Are you &^%ing insane?

 

[Shyghoul]

, , , , :drosh: should stay.

 

[Smashley]

:pyro: should go as well.

I agree with the first three, but I think Baby Luigi should stay.

is also ugly.

I don't think he's that bad.

I might even consider dk2 going as well.

no

 

[Ray Trace]

is also ugly.

I don't think he's that bad.

He isn't, my SISTER made that. I don't mind some constructive criticism, but calling it UGLY?

 

[-----]

this is all porple folks

but still can't we at least keep

i mean

it's beautiful

 

[RandomYoshi]

this is all porple folks

but still can't we at least keep

i mean

it's beautiful

No, it isn't beautiful and it has no place here.

 

[EctoBiologist]

this is all porple folks

but still can't we at least keep

i mean

it's beautiful

no

it should go back to and get some transparency.

it's fuggly without transparency and I hate the fact it took my edited smiley's place. :c

 

[Ray Trace]

this is all porple folks

but still can't we at least keep

i mean

it's beautiful

The transparency is bad. I mean, lack of thereof.

But if you want it that bad, you can just image tag it instead of making it a smiley

 

[Nathan Fielder]

fucking hell guys why can't we talk about anything but fucking smilies

just get rid of all the dumb ones (except barkley, he's so precious)

 

[Daniel Dyce]

this is all porple folks

but still can't we at least keep

i mean

it's beautiful

no

it should go back to and get some transparency.

it's fuggly without transparency and I hate the fact it took my edited smiley's place. :c

Your smiley sucked anyways

 

[Turboo]

is also ugly.

I don't think he's that bad.

He isn't, my SISTER made that. I don't mind some constructive criticism, but calling it UGLY?

this post is basically implying that it would be ok to insult it if ANYONE OTHER than your sister made it. just because you're related to the maker doesn't make it exempt from criticism

also i want to keep barkley because i love him (and he replaced trickster mario)

 

[EctoBiologist]

is also ugly.

I don't think he's that bad.

He isn't, my SISTER made that. I don't mind some constructive criticism, but calling it UGLY?

this post is basically implying that it would be ok to insult it if ANYONE OTHER than your sister made it. just because you're related to the maker doesn't make it exempt from criticism

also i want to keep barkley because i love him (and he replaced trickster mario)

no