(already posted on http://www.mariowiki.com/Talk:Mario_Is_Missing!, but I suppose I might as well get more visibility here)
Looking at videos and writeups of the various versions of Mario Is Missing (SNES, DOS and NES) and Mario's Time Machine (SNES and NES), it seems fairly obvious to me that the different releases aren't "ports" as much as different games that happen to share similar assets and the premise (think Arcade vs NES Contra). There's some fairly noticeable differences (presence/absence of NPCs, different trivia questions, map system, etc) that, at the very least, make them more differentiated than the Super Mario Advance releases, which do have separate pages.
I doubt anyone will be in a rush to split the pages since lol educational games, but I would like some validation in case I eventually do decide to go ahead. Or maybe I missed something and the current arrangement is infact preferable?
Looking at videos and writeups of the various versions of Mario Is Missing (SNES, DOS and NES) and Mario's Time Machine (SNES and NES), it seems fairly obvious to me that the different releases aren't "ports" as much as different games that happen to share similar assets and the premise (think Arcade vs NES Contra). There's some fairly noticeable differences (presence/absence of NPCs, different trivia questions, map system, etc) that, at the very least, make them more differentiated than the Super Mario Advance releases, which do have separate pages.
I doubt anyone will be in a rush to split the pages since lol educational games, but I would like some validation in case I eventually do decide to go ahead. Or maybe I missed something and the current arrangement is infact preferable?