YoshiFlutterJump
Power Star
- MarioWiki
- YoshiFlutterJump
Why did Nintendo make so many versions of these games...?
I've been wanting to get the early Mario games for a while now, but the question stands as to what versions of the games I should get. Ive played SMB1 and SMB2J via amiibo tap, and both were very fun games. SMB3, while I havent played it, is commonly referred to as one of the top Mario games. I played Mario USA through amiibo tap, and I didnt enjoy it too much; that said, Im still including it here because its part of the group.
So my pick? Probably GBC/GBA. But I want to hear what you guys think. Ive also included options for "get them all" and "they're all bad" just in case. And just to be ultra-clear, this is a comparison between versions, not consoles or games.
I've been wanting to get the early Mario games for a while now, but the question stands as to what versions of the games I should get. Ive played SMB1 and SMB2J via amiibo tap, and both were very fun games. SMB3, while I havent played it, is commonly referred to as one of the top Mario games. I played Mario USA through amiibo tap, and I didnt enjoy it too much; that said, Im still including it here because its part of the group.
The NES versions were the originals and make sense to play first, but the graphics are kind of glitchy (the double-item glitch, for instance) and SMB3 lacks replayable levels. They also werent designed for saving, which may mean restarting the game pretty often (I can still save through VC, though). SMB1 has also pretty much been outdone by SMBDX, but this way I at least get to try the secret worlds in Lost Levels.
The SNES versions all come in one package, so convenience is certainly in its favor. However, I've heard complaints about the SMB1 and SMB2J physics here, and SMB2J has been dummied down a whole lot. I've also heard complaints about the art style basically being the same throughout the games. At least the SMB3 levels are replayable here. I generally hear that the NES is better for SMB1 and SMB2J, while SNES is better for SMUSA and SMB3; and that doesnt really help considering that they all come in one package.
Then theres the GBC and GBA versions, including SMBDX, SMA1, and SMA4. In the case of SMBDX, it seems like the optimal option for SMB1 but not as good for SMB2J (due to the lack of secret worlds). That said, its only a dollar more than SMB1 and I could probably get Lost Levels separately on my Wii U (having it on two consoles makes it more worth it anyway). SMA4 comes with World-e, a set of 38 bonus levels. That sounds interesting, and Ill be getting this on VC anyway for ease of access. SMA4 also retains the replayability of SMAS. I also hear that SMA1 is the superior version of SMUSA. I also hear that theres a GBA version of SMB1, but thats virtually identical to the NES version and wont be considered here. The downsides? I hear that the audio is inferior, some rooms have been scaled down to accommodate the smaller screen, and the aforementioned lack of Lost Levels secret worlds. None of those are that major, though, and I'm leaning toward this option at the moment. It lacks multiplayer on VC, but thats not saying much considering that the multiplayer was mostly turn-based (SMB3 Battle Mode being an exception).
The SNES versions all come in one package, so convenience is certainly in its favor. However, I've heard complaints about the SMB1 and SMB2J physics here, and SMB2J has been dummied down a whole lot. I've also heard complaints about the art style basically being the same throughout the games. At least the SMB3 levels are replayable here. I generally hear that the NES is better for SMB1 and SMB2J, while SNES is better for SMUSA and SMB3; and that doesnt really help considering that they all come in one package.
Then theres the GBC and GBA versions, including SMBDX, SMA1, and SMA4. In the case of SMBDX, it seems like the optimal option for SMB1 but not as good for SMB2J (due to the lack of secret worlds). That said, its only a dollar more than SMB1 and I could probably get Lost Levels separately on my Wii U (having it on two consoles makes it more worth it anyway). SMA4 comes with World-e, a set of 38 bonus levels. That sounds interesting, and Ill be getting this on VC anyway for ease of access. SMA4 also retains the replayability of SMAS. I also hear that SMA1 is the superior version of SMUSA. I also hear that theres a GBA version of SMB1, but thats virtually identical to the NES version and wont be considered here. The downsides? I hear that the audio is inferior, some rooms have been scaled down to accommodate the smaller screen, and the aforementioned lack of Lost Levels secret worlds. None of those are that major, though, and I'm leaning toward this option at the moment. It lacks multiplayer on VC, but thats not saying much considering that the multiplayer was mostly turn-based (SMB3 Battle Mode being an exception).
So my pick? Probably GBC/GBA. But I want to hear what you guys think. Ive also included options for "get them all" and "they're all bad" just in case. And just to be ultra-clear, this is a comparison between versions, not consoles or games.