Koopa con Carne
call me Hot Lips, 'cause i'm a one-shot wonder
- MarioWiki
- Koopa con Carne
I think it should. The myth of Odysseus must remain alive in our collective spirit for as long as humans will tread the earth.
Ok, sorry. I obviously mean Super Mario Odyssey. It seems that the spin-offs that came after that game were less bothered to keep it relevant. Compare this to other mainline Mario games, which would leave a sort of "legacy" through future games. Super Mario 64 introduced the red eels, the Power Stars, and one of Bowser's most recognizable themes, and after Super Mario Sunshine, it was rare not to see Isle Delfino, Piantas and Toadsworth appearing throughout the GameCube era and even well into the Wii era. Another example is Super Mario Galaxy, which introduced Rosalina who became an important part of the Mario cast in virtually no time. Even the New Super Mario Bros. games helped reshape the Mario world into the puffy mellow happy-go-lucky world we see so often in spin-off games, especially Mario Party.
From Odyssey, the most we've got in other games were... Kleptos. In Mario Tennis Aces. And they don't even originate in that game; it's just that they use their new design. You'd think Pauline would rise to the likes of Rosalina and Princess Peach, and that knowledge of New Donk City would be as prevalent as Mushroom Kingdom or Delfino Plaza.
Instead, NSMB still seems to be oozing out of every pore of Mario's core after two generations. Super Mario Party seems to be an indication that the franchise is going to stay like that. IDK, it just seems weird to me that Odyssey didn't become as relevant as other games from the past, considering how fresh and diverse it felt.
Do you think Mario spin-off games have simply found their own identity that doesn't need to be tarnished by any new major game?
P.S.: I know Smash Ultimate is gonna feature many things from Odyssey, but that game is upfront referencing past games because it is part of its duty to do so.
Ok, sorry. I obviously mean Super Mario Odyssey. It seems that the spin-offs that came after that game were less bothered to keep it relevant. Compare this to other mainline Mario games, which would leave a sort of "legacy" through future games. Super Mario 64 introduced the red eels, the Power Stars, and one of Bowser's most recognizable themes, and after Super Mario Sunshine, it was rare not to see Isle Delfino, Piantas and Toadsworth appearing throughout the GameCube era and even well into the Wii era. Another example is Super Mario Galaxy, which introduced Rosalina who became an important part of the Mario cast in virtually no time. Even the New Super Mario Bros. games helped reshape the Mario world into the puffy mellow happy-go-lucky world we see so often in spin-off games, especially Mario Party.
From Odyssey, the most we've got in other games were... Kleptos. In Mario Tennis Aces. And they don't even originate in that game; it's just that they use their new design. You'd think Pauline would rise to the likes of Rosalina and Princess Peach, and that knowledge of New Donk City would be as prevalent as Mushroom Kingdom or Delfino Plaza.
Instead, NSMB still seems to be oozing out of every pore of Mario's core after two generations. Super Mario Party seems to be an indication that the franchise is going to stay like that. IDK, it just seems weird to me that Odyssey didn't become as relevant as other games from the past, considering how fresh and diverse it felt.
Do you think Mario spin-off games have simply found their own identity that doesn't need to be tarnished by any new major game?
P.S.: I know Smash Ultimate is gonna feature many things from Odyssey, but that game is upfront referencing past games because it is part of its duty to do so.