Suggestions for Improvement

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

Here's my opinion on the matter. 30 days is a bit too short of a time period in my opinion; 60 days seems more fitting. It gives that subject 2 months to be revived, so long as it is a useful post.

That's what the rule is now.

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

Well, 60 days would certainly be an improvement, but I would like it if we were one of the forums that "didn't care".

No.

 

[Stooben]

Here's my opinion on the matter. 30 days is a bit too short of a time period in my opinion; 60 days seems more fitting. It gives that subject 2 months to be revived, so long as it is a useful post.

That's what the rule is now.

No it's not. :| 30 days, set in stone. If someone posts beyond that point, no matter what, 9 times out of 10 that topic will be locked. Only on rare occasions have we made exceptions. (Like the Mega Man 9 topic that was bumped by SolarBlaze.) The mods agreed that that bump was fine, but some of our members became upset because it was as if we weren't really enforcing a set-in-stone rule.

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

Here's my opinion on the matter. 30 days is a bit too short of a time period in my opinion; 60 days seems more fitting. It gives that subject 2 months to be revived, so long as it is a useful post.

That's what the rule is now.

No it's not. :| 30 days, set in stone. If someone posts beyond that point, no matter what, 9 times out of 10 that topic will be locked. Only on rare occasions have we made exceptions. (Like the Mega Man 9 topic that was bumped by SolarBlaze.) The mods agreed that that bump was fine, but some of our members became upset because it was as if we weren't really enforcing a set-in-stone rule.

Lies.

If it adds something to the topic, it's allowed to be at most 60 days old. If it doesn't, it's closed after 30. I've said this before.

 

[ShyGuy27]

Here's my opinion on the matter. 30 days is a bit too short of a time period in my opinion; 60 days seems more fitting. It gives that subject 2 months to be revived, so long as it is a useful post.

That's what the rule is now.

No it's not. :| 30 days, set in stone. If someone posts beyond that point, no matter what, 9 times out of 10 that topic will be locked. Only on rare occasions have we made exceptions. (Like the Mega Man 9 topic that was bumped by SolarBlaze.) The mods agreed that that bump was fine, but some of our members became upset because it was as if we weren't really enforcing a set-in-stone rule.

Lies.

If it adds something to the topic, it's allowed to be at most 60 days old. If it doesn't, it's closed after 30. I've said this before.

Another instance of making up rules on the spot? To anticipate your next comment, I present to you the rule, quoted straight from the rules:

14. Do not bump threads a month or more old, what's done is done.

Important parts bolded for your convenience.

Also, nice double post back there.

 

[Stooben]

Here's my opinion on the matter. 30 days is a bit too short of a time period in my opinion; 60 days seems more fitting. It gives that subject 2 months to be revived, so long as it is a useful post.

That's what the rule is now.

No it's not. :| 30 days, set in stone. If someone posts beyond that point, no matter what, 9 times out of 10 that topic will be locked. Only on rare occasions have we made exceptions. (Like the Mega Man 9 topic that was bumped by SolarBlaze.) The mods agreed that that bump was fine, but some of our members became upset because it was as if we weren't really enforcing a set-in-stone rule.

Lies.

If it adds something to the topic, it's allowed to be at most 60 days old. If it doesn't, it's closed after 30. I've said this before.

Then let's make it an official rule. =)

 

[ShyGuy27]

Nooooo, my entire argument destroyed. >.<

I'll be back, just you wait.

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

Another instance of making up rules on the spot? To anticipate your next comment, I present to you the rule, quoted straight from the rules:

14. Do not bump threads a month or more old, what's done is done.

Important parts bolded for your convenience.

Way to be a total jackass.

We're still rewriting the rules, remember?

Also, nice double post back there.

Nobody gives a damn.

Then let's make it an official rule. =)

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

 

[ShyGuy27]

Another instance of making up rules on the spot? To anticipate your next comment, I present to you the rule, quoted straight from the rules:

14. Do not bump threads a month or more old, what's done is done.

Important parts bolded for your convenience.

Way to be a total jackass.

We're still rewriting the rules, remember?

Also, nice double post back there.

Nobody gives a damn.

Then let's make it an official rule. =)

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

1) How long does it take to rerwite like 16 rules? You can't use that as an excuse to just make stuff up. Also, way to be incognito with the flame there.

2) You're a f***ing mod, you should give a damn. Or not and we can all just double post. Remember:

I'm not God.

3) <see #1 minus the flaming part>

 

[Stooben]

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

Well, duh. That's why we mods have that nice 'modify' button -- so we can update things. :D

Also, keep it cool, guys. Don't make me lock you all up in the dungeon.

 

[ShyGuy27]

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

Well, duh. That's why we mods have that nice 'modify' button -- so we can update things. :D

Also, keep it cool, guys. Don't make me lock you all up in the dungeon.

Hey, he's the one double posting and flaming. I'm just pointing out rules. This place is so unfair...

 

[Stooben]

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

Well, duh. That's why we mods have that nice 'modify' button -- so we can update things. :D

Also, keep it cool, guys. Don't make me lock you all up in the dungeon.

Hey, he's the one double posting and flaming. I'm just pointing out rules. This place is so unfair...

I noticed.

But things always tend to go in a spiral. Just jumping in the water before it gets too hot.

 

[ShyGuy27]

I see, very wise indeed. Now when we both get banned, you can say "told you so".

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

1) How long does it take to rerwite like 16 rules? You can't use that as an excuse to just make stuff up.

Except that I'm not making stuff up. Don't talk about what you don't know, it makes you seem like an idiot.

Also, way to be incognito with the flame there.

Way to be incognito with the whole "UR MAKIN STUFF UP WHEN YOU REALLY AREN'T OMG DOUBLE POST BAN BAN BAN BAN" thing.

2) You're a f***ing mod, you should give a damn. Or not and we can all just double post. Remember:

I'm not God.

Since when did being a mod mean I have to be perfect? I didn't say I was God, you're just jumping to conclusions.

3) <see #1 minus the flaming part>

<see #1>

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

Well, duh. That's why we mods have that nice 'modify' button -- so we can update things. :D

Also, keep it cool, guys. Don't make me lock you all up in the dungeon.

Hey, he's the one double posting and flaming. I'm just pointing out rules. This place is so unfair...

In an extremely snarky and jackass-y way. If you really were just doing this to poitn out the rules, you wouldn't be acting like a jackass. This is a witch hunt.

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

If you are currently rewriting the rules, why don't you update them frequently?

Totally valid point. We might be doing that in the near future.

There should not be any rules that exist and are not there, or any rules that are there and don't exist.

Thus why we're rewriting them.

And just how long have you been in the process of rewriting these rules? Months? How long could it take?

To be fair, we have been doing other stuff, and real life always comes before the internet, etc., etc.

 

[ShyGuy27]

1) How long does it take to rerwite like 16 rules? You can't use that as an excuse to just make stuff up.

Except that I'm not making stuff up. Don't talk about what you don't know, it makes you seem like an idiot.

Also, way to be incognito with the flame there.

Way to be incognito with the whole "UR MAKIN STUFF UP WHEN YOU REALLY AREN'T OMG DOUBLE POST BAN BAN BAN BAN" thing.

2) You're a f***ing mod, you should give a damn. Or not and we can all just double post. Remember:

I'm not God.

Since when did being a mod mean I have to be perfect? I didn't say I was God, you're just jumping to conclusions.

3) <see #1 minus the flaming part>

<see #1>

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

Well, duh. That's why we mods have that nice 'modify' button -- so we can update things. :D

Also, keep it cool, guys. Don't make me lock you all up in the dungeon.

Hey, he's the one double posting and flaming. I'm just pointing out rules. This place is so unfair...

In an extremely snarky and jackass-y way. If you really were just doing this to poitn out the rules, you wouldn't be acting like a jackass. This is a witch hunt.

1) Proof that it's not made up or you're making stuff up. If there's no evidence that a random rule no one's ever seen was ever brought up before, people are going to assume that it's being made up. It's called common sense. Also, nice incognito flame again loser (look I can do it too).

2) You were making stuff up as far as anyone without access to where all these new rules are posted can tell.

3) You blatantly broke a rule and when it was pointed out you said "no one gives a damn". That's a bit beyond an imperfection.

4) <see #1>

5) Technically it's a ninji hunt.

 

[Stooben]

If you are currently rewriting the rules, why don't you update them frequently?

Totally valid point. We might be doing that in the near future.

Exactly that.

Second most annoying mindset ever,

That doesn't make it untrue.

You blatantly broke a rule and when it was pointed out you said "no one gives a damn". That's a bit beyond an imperfection.

Generally, the first double post results in a bunch of people telling you "don't double post". If it happens a second time, said offender gets a warning. If he does it again, he will receive a warning.

Way to be a total jackass.

Also, nice incognito flame again loser (look I can do it too).

...

No.

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

1) How long does it take to rerwite like 16 rules? You can't use that as an excuse to just make stuff up.

Except that I'm not making stuff up. Don't talk about what you don't know, it makes you seem like an idiot.

Also, way to be incognito with the flame there.

Way to be incognito with the whole "UR MAKIN STUFF UP WHEN YOU REALLY AREN'T OMG DOUBLE POST BAN BAN BAN BAN" thing.

2) You're a f***ing mod, you should give a damn. Or not and we can all just double post. Remember:

I'm not God.

Since when did being a mod mean I have to be perfect? I didn't say I was God, you're just jumping to conclusions.

3) <see #1 minus the flaming part>

<see #1>

We're rewriting all of the rules, remember? The ones that are up are horribly outdated.

Well, duh. That's why we mods have that nice 'modify' button -- so we can update things. :D

Also, keep it cool, guys. Don't make me lock you all up in the dungeon.

Hey, he's the one double posting and flaming. I'm just pointing out rules. This place is so unfair...

In an extremely snarky and jackass-y way. If you really were just doing this to poitn out the rules, you wouldn't be acting like a jackass. This is a witch hunt.

1) Proof that it's not made up or you're making stuff up. If there's no evidence that a random rule no one's ever seen was ever brought up before, people are going to assume that it's being made up. It's called common sense. Also, nice incognito flame again loser (look I can do it too).

2) You were making stuff up as far as anyone without access to where all these new rules are posted can tell.

3) You blatantly broke a rule and when it was pointed out you said "no one gives a damn". That's a bit beyond an imperfection.

4) <see #1>

5) Technically it's a ninji hunt.

1.) The fact that Stooben's acknowledged it means that I didn't just make it up. Also, I said it makes you look like an idiot. I didn't say you were an idiot.

2.) I've said this stuff before. You guys have bad memories or something.

3.) Because you were pointing out something just for the sake of getting me in trouble, not to enforce the rules. Don't make yourself seem better.

4.) This is a bit redundant.

5.) FAir enough.

...

No.

My bad.

To be fair, we have been doing other stuff, and real life always comes before the internet, etc., etc.

Second most annoying mindset ever, right after "It's the 21st century, all fictional female characters need to be able to kill any of the male characters from whatever work of fiction they're from. Because we can't be sexist, you know".
But that has nothing to do with this.
I'm just sick of that and had nowhere else to say it.

...

'K.

It's still true.

 

[ShyGuy27]

1) I acknowledge the fact that it exists, but it's hard to tell that you're not making it up when you just say stuff.

2) Fair enough.

3) That doesn't change facts. Also, it would seem you have yet to merge the two posts.

4) Agreed.

 

[Stooben]

The Bowser skin should be completed within a few days. :D

 

[ShyGuy27]

Nice.

 

[SiFi]

The Bowser skin should be completed within a few days. :D

You're just saying that to change the subject.

 

[Hyper Guy]

I only said blue as it is actually quite a relaxing colour. Red can lead to stress.:P For example,we get rid of the red backgrounds,and replace them with a blue colour.:D Isn't that right,Happy Happiest?
Happy Happiest:Blue,Blue...
Jolly good!

 

[[ohgodpleasedelete]]

I only said blue as it is actually quite a relaxing colour. Red can lead to stress.:P For example,we get rid of the red backgrounds,and replace them with a blue colour.:D Isn't that right,Happy Happiest?
Happy Happiest:Blue,Blue...
Jolly good!

No.

The Bowser skin should be completed within a few days. :D

You're just saying that to change the subject.

Or maybe because (*gasp*) it's almost done. Ever think of that?

 

[ShyGuy27]

The Bowser skin should be completed within a few days. :D

You're just saying that to change the subject.

Or maybe because (*gasp*) it's almost done. Ever think of that?

Either way, it's for the best.