So I'm currently revisiting the past of Hamsteak and just got done with Act 5 again. After rereading the entire thing AND watching Cascade, I have to conclude that there is something that makes no sense to me.
Namely this.
This paragraph sounds like nonsense to me and contradicts the truth. The sentence implies that something happened to Bec Noir, a significant event in which the kids forcefully exiled him from their session, something that made him so afraid of it happening again that it altered his usual habits.
But that makes no sense. He was never forcefully banished. He was never "outsmarted" by anyone. He hopped sessions on his own accord, through his own actions, with no involvement from the kids. I guess you could sort of argue that "his hand was forced by the scratch" which would indirectly make John responsible for Noir's decision to session hop. But that feels like kind of a stretch to me, and I don't know if this would justify the shift in his behavior pattern. Plus, if that was the reason, he'd only really have to blow up Aradia's planet (and maybe all the other ones if he doesn't know which one belongs to the time player), not Prospit and Derse.
Does anyone get this? Because to me it seems like some sort of plot hole. Like, maybe Hussie planned to have the kids banish Noir directly, but then changed it to a more indirect chain of events and just forgot that that paragraph existed?
Or maybe Hussie is innocent, but Doc Scratch is full of shit and actually does lie. That would be kind of funny, actually.
Speaking of Doc Scratch being a lying sack of shit: I noticed something else.
http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&p=005529
This quote from the doctor is complete bullshit and outright contradicts the tale of the Sufferer, who experienced exactly such a merger of memory. So apparently it can happen and Doc Scratch lied. He is thus only fit to be called a hack and should go polish his shame globe immediately and permanently.
One could try to weasel him out of this contradiction by saying "oh, but he said 'this', so it only counts for THIS timeline", but that kind of reeks of arguing semantics and would be really lame, so don't do it, Marowak.
Namely this.
The Slayer was, for the moment, unmotivated by the Thief's motion for a compelling duel. This side of The Scratch, he opted for a more ruthless and calculating policy of extermination. On his arrival, not about to repeat the mistakes leading to his banishment, he quickly obliterated all twelve planets, followed by Prospit and Derse, to weed out those who might outsmart him in the same manner.
This paragraph sounds like nonsense to me and contradicts the truth. The sentence implies that something happened to Bec Noir, a significant event in which the kids forcefully exiled him from their session, something that made him so afraid of it happening again that it altered his usual habits.
But that makes no sense. He was never forcefully banished. He was never "outsmarted" by anyone. He hopped sessions on his own accord, through his own actions, with no involvement from the kids. I guess you could sort of argue that "his hand was forced by the scratch" which would indirectly make John responsible for Noir's decision to session hop. But that feels like kind of a stretch to me, and I don't know if this would justify the shift in his behavior pattern. Plus, if that was the reason, he'd only really have to blow up Aradia's planet (and maybe all the other ones if he doesn't know which one belongs to the time player), not Prospit and Derse.
Does anyone get this? Because to me it seems like some sort of plot hole. Like, maybe Hussie planned to have the kids banish Noir directly, but then changed it to a more indirect chain of events and just forgot that that paragraph existed?
Or maybe Hussie is innocent, but Doc Scratch is full of shit and actually does lie. That would be kind of funny, actually.
Speaking of Doc Scratch being a lying sack of shit: I noticed something else.
http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&p=005529
Since this timeline will undergo such a violent upheaval, such a merger of memory cannot happen.
This quote from the doctor is complete bullshit and outright contradicts the tale of the Sufferer, who experienced exactly such a merger of memory. So apparently it can happen and Doc Scratch lied. He is thus only fit to be called a hack and should go polish his shame globe immediately and permanently.
One could try to weasel him out of this contradiction by saying "oh, but he said 'this', so it only counts for THIS timeline", but that kind of reeks of arguing semantics and would be really lame, so don't do it, Marowak.