Fine, can we agree, that they would class as alternate-canon?Uniju said:No, their not canon because their not part of the main series.
If you didn't know, the main series consists of all the games which go by the same basic Gameplay design (Platforming), and the basic story lay out of the other Main Series games, which really means just having almost no story whatsoever. The Super Mario Bros. (Includes Super Mario World, as it was Super Mario Bros. 4: Super Mario World in japan) series is the first part of the Main Series, after which, no matter how much you dislike them, DP, Super Mario 64, Super Mario Sunshine, and Super Mario Galaxy follow in the Main Series.
Anything other then this, apart from Yoshi's Island, being canon or not is left up to the Player's to decide, as Miyamoto has never been big on stories, and stuff. Which leads to arguments between the people who say eveything is canon, the people who say only the games THEY like are canon, and the people who only thing the Main Series are canon.
Also, I am calm.
Also, did I EVER say SM64, SMS and SMG weren't canon? In my eyes, any game that has a story is canonical, but, that's just how me and my brother have viewed. Whether it is the correct view or not, I'm not sure. Also, you say that all games have to have the same gameplay to be canon. What about Star Fox Adventures? That copied the gameplay from The Legend of Zelda, which drew away from the Rail Shooter feel of Star Fox. But, Adventures is still considered canon to the Star Fox series, especially since Krystal and Dinosaur Planet later appeared in Star Fox Assault. And, just so you know, Star Fox Adventures borrowed several elements and characters from previous installments, Andross being the main link of this game to Star Fox and Star Fox 64.
But, whatever. I'm about ready to end this argument. =|