Ultraluigi
doing whatever since 2011
Nintendo has created lots of babies. And according to KingBooWarioSir, they just created Baby Waluigi. Would you like to see other baby versions of characters?
Should Nintendo make more babies?
- Thread starter Ultraluigi
- Start date
Propeller Toad
Dislikes the amount of neglect Toad receives...
To be honest, I really wouldn't like to see more Baby characters. It was a perfect and original idea when they created Baby Mario and Baby Luigi; however, upon creating more of them made the idea seem so redundant. Also creating baby characters for the less important characters (such as Daisy and more recently Waluigi) really did do no justice as well as serve no purpose.
I'm fine with the original two babies; however, I really do not want to see the others unless it is a game related to Yoshi's Island. The other babies literally serve little to no purpose either way.
Ultraluigi
doing whatever since 2011
- Thread starter
- #3
There were baby toads in Paper Mario. Baby Mario and Baby Luigi were good, Baby Peach was okay, Baby Wario and Baby DK were pushing it, Baby Daisy was a bad idea, but now this Baby Waluigi is the worst idea EVER. Creating a spinoff baby of a spinoff character? DUMB ALERT DUMB ALERT DUMB ALERT.
Propeller Toad
Dislikes the amount of neglect Toad receives...
Baby Peach/DK/Wario were alright as they expressed their own abilities in Yoshi's Island DS; however, I just feel that they are unnecessary otherwise in the regular Mario series. Baby Peach served a bit of a role in M& L: PiT; but otherwise that was it.
Baby Daisy really took the matter a bit too far as there was no reason for her existence in a spin-off game. This was the true starting of where the babies began to become "hated". Baby Waluigi...let's not go there. Baby Mario and Baby Luigi were unique when they appear in the spin-offs as representatives of the Yoshi series; however, when more babies start to arrive they just destroy the unique feeling of the baby characters. Anyways, that is my thought.
As for Baby Toad, he could work. However, I guess that was just the arrogant feeling I had when I noticed Toad wasn't included in Yoshi's Island DS. :P
Baby Daisy really took the matter a bit too far as there was no reason for her existence in a spin-off game. This was the true starting of where the babies began to become "hated". Baby Waluigi...let's not go there. Baby Mario and Baby Luigi were unique when they appear in the spin-offs as representatives of the Yoshi series; however, when more babies start to arrive they just destroy the unique feeling of the baby characters. Anyways, that is my thought.
As for Baby Toad, he could work. However, I guess that was just the arrogant feeling I had when I noticed Toad wasn't included in Yoshi's Island DS. :P
I don't know why but my first thought was "So he's asking if we think Nintendo should produce babies". Then i realized it was babies from the games.
Anyway, I think No. Baby mario & Luigi are fine, although I find them unoriginal, it's alright. baby Peach, not so much, the other babies no and baby daisy, no way in hell. For Yoshi's Island, Yes, for spin-off's, hell no.
Anyway, I think No. Baby mario & Luigi are fine, although I find them unoriginal, it's alright. baby Peach, not so much, the other babies no and baby daisy, no way in hell. For Yoshi's Island, Yes, for spin-off's, hell no.
Dorayaki
King Bowser
I honestly say please take care of Yoshi series future games before babies
so if not, talking about this is not meaningful sicne babies must rely on their game appearances
unless you just mean that you want to see commercial products just like Disney babies (baby Mickey club, baby princesses etc) :P
the fact is the staff can't even deal with main characters' appearances, no other room for more babies
in a view that they are subseries characters, they can only vote for several representives to be in racing
basically only baby Mario bros and princesses can be secondary players among some games
unless you make rotation (ex. no baby Mario but baby Wario in Kart 10)
so if not, talking about this is not meaningful sicne babies must rely on their game appearances
unless you just mean that you want to see commercial products just like Disney babies (baby Mickey club, baby princesses etc) :P
firstly if some others mean spinoff appearancesUniju said:
the fact is the staff can't even deal with main characters' appearances, no other room for more babies
in a view that they are subseries characters, they can only vote for several representives to be in racing
basically only baby Mario bros and princesses can be secondary players among some games
unless you make rotation (ex. no baby Mario but baby Wario in Kart 10)
Ultraluigi
doing whatever since 2011
- Thread starter
- #8
Why do you colour your text like that? You know you can just bold it, right?Dorayaki said:
I meant create babies, not give birth to them.Crackin355 said:
Dorayaki
King Bowser
basically I'm with that when plot need, then other babies appear, not for fans' idea or loveMnSG said:
but if some other adult friends who were also childhood friend of them (ex, Daisy or DK's gang)
I don't think they shouldn't appear (in future Yoshi series) reasonably, just focus on that it's the fact of past
actually I was not happy about the "7 stars" since there was no criterion to exclude other babies
Ultraluigi
doing whatever since 2011
- Thread starter
- #11
I think they should stick to those babies too. Anyway, forget what I said about Baby Waluigi, it was a hoax by some fan.MnSG said:
UltraMario
Donkey Kong
hahaha no
Pandapowah
King Bowser
No more babies. I think 7 babies are enough!
GalacticPetey
Donkey Kong
No more babies. What's next, baby goomba?
Depends on which ones they make a baby goomba would be cute so would a baby shy guy
Pandapowah
King Bowser
GalacticPetey said:
If there was a Baby Goomba, it would probably be an enemy which I think could be fine.
Dorayaki
King Bowser
unspecific species may not doing with Yoshi series since it's the pastAmbush Bug said:
and "now" we can find other new babies in every village, just like mini yoshi in Paper TT
if you mean players outside Yoshi seriesBaby Luigi said:
the fact is currently only baby Mario bros and princesses may be represetives in spinoffs, so how many babies wouldn't be cared
though I think it depends on the situation, but it's not fixed actuallyPandapowah said:
as a presequel we can't stop the staff to talk about everyone's past if necessary
at least the already-made baby Daisy must appear in the next Yoshi game, IMO
so in reality what would too many babies lead to?
What makes Baby Peach Filler and what makes Baby Mario Non-FillerBaby Luigi said:
- Pronouns
- she/her
- MarioWiki
- Mario
Baby Mario was here since 1995.
- Pronouns
- She/her
- MarioWiki
- Ray Trace
Ambush Bug said:
Baby Mario: He was put in Mario Tennis N64. And his first appearance was Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island. I thought his appearance was a nod to that game, which was super popular and allowed Yoshi to branch off to his own series.
Baby Peach: She was from Mario Luigi Partners in Crime. She was then put into Yoshi's Island DS. I can't really explain it but her role in Mario Kart Wii was screaming FILLER. I understand placing the baby bros. into Mario Kart Double Dash (I don't know any decent characters for that game, besides, IMO, it was a smart move), but Baby Peach simply felt redundant. Now, I have completely nothing against Baby Peach but if they saved her after they use less redundant characters, I wouldn't be so angry at her inclusion.
But Baby Marios apperance in games like Mario Kart Wii and Mario Golf 64 aren't filler also Baby Peach was in Partners in time and Yoshi's Island DS Both of which were quite popularBaby Luigi said:
Baby Luigi & Baby Mario were the only babies (Aside from baby Bowser) for a long time. Then came PiT and Yoshi DS. Baby Peach is only recent, She isn't very major and she really is, just a filler.
Ultraluigi
doing whatever since 2011
- Thread starter
- #25
Nintendo, why must you do this???Sharks Territory said: