Unpopular opinions about the Mario series

Glaceon said:
I spent 100+ hours on a single file in that game.

In Mario & Luigi: Superstaga, the time reads as 99:59. Lawl. I think Partners in Time similar but i haven't checked yet.
 
Shadow said:
Rin Kagamine said:
NSMB2 didn't suck, at least not to me.

I don't see why people have to have a "brand new" game each time. Nintendo can't come up with completely new gimmicks every time they make a game, and I think you guys should just be grateful they are still making games. Saying a game "sucks" just because it uses the same gimmicks as a previous game is really stupid, in my opinion.
Do you realize what you're saying?
So WHAT, it's basically just DLC for a game that was already terrible? So WHAT, it had a price tag of $40? The NSMB series has only worn out 99.99999999% of its welcome, so this game is still OK!
It's called an opinion. The thread title is called "Unpopular opinions of the Mario series", and it's my opinion, and so clearly it belongs here. People can have different opinions, you know.

Either way, that's not what I was saying. Don't put words in my mouth. I never grew up on every single classic Mario game there is like a lot of people.

In fact, my first Mario game was NSMB, therefore it could be considered a "classic" for me.
 
Baby Luigi said:
Glaceon said:
I spent 100+ hours on a single file in that game.

In Mario & Luigi: Superstaga, the time reads as 99:59. Lawl. I think Partners in Time similar but i haven't checked yet.

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team caps at 99:59 hours, for the record. I wish these games lasted longer, honestly.
 
Rin Kagamine said:
I don't see why people have to have a "brand new" game each time. Nintendo can't come up with completely new gimmicks every time they make a game, and I think you guys should just be grateful they are still making games. Saying a game "sucks" just because it uses the same gimmicks as a previous game is really stupid, in my opinion.

I don't care if it's an opinion; opinions can be formed by misinformation too. I can understand you enjoy New Super Mario Bros. 2, but justifying how the game is a stagnant, rehashed, cynical cash-grab baffles me. It's a legitimate criticism for a game to be exactly the same as it has been. No changes, no improvements, and barely any effort to differentiate itself, and its stand-out mechanic is not built around as the reward is miniscule. Nintendo has the resources to make an entirely different game, and they can pour more effort into making a Mario game that actually tries to stand-out, but nope, Mario sells, so that encourages them to put as least effort as possible into the game. Movies, in a related note, also get criticized if they are too much the same like another movie, and yes, they are legitamate criticisms.

I wouldn't have defended myself if you haven't said that games can't be criticized for being more of the same.

Glaceon said:
Baby Luigi said:
Glaceon said:
I spent 100+ hours on a single file in that game.

In Mario & Luigi: Superstaga, the time reads as 99:59. Lawl. I think Partners in Time similar but i haven't checked yet.

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team caps at 99:59 hours, for the record. I wish these games lasted longer, honestly.

It does last longer than that; the game just stops tracking your time when you reach there.
 
Baby Luigi said:
Glaceon said:
Baby Luigi said:
Glaceon said:
I spent 100+ hours on a single file in that game.

In Mario & Luigi: Superstaga, the time reads as 99:59. Lawl. I think Partners in Time similar but i haven't checked yet.

Mario & Luigi: Dream Team caps at 99:59 hours, for the record. I wish these games lasted longer, honestly.

It does last longer than that; the game just stops tracking your time when you reach there.

Yeah, I've played beyond those almost 100 hours, though I also meant the timer. I'm curious how much time I've spent on one of my files.
 
I didn't say that, or at least I didn't mean to put it that way. I wasn't saying people couldn't criticize, I was just saying I really didn't understand why. There is a difference.

The grateful part i didn't really mean though, and I'm sorry if that sounded rude.

I just wasn't getting it. That's all.
 
Well, I'm just explaining it to you why we think the same games over and over are not a good thing. This is basically the same reason I don't like Pokemon; it just bores me to death.

btw, Mario Party is not a stagnating franchise (I mean look at all the change, it made the series even WORSE)
 
I get it now. Thanks.

And actually, I do agree on the Mario Party theme, even though I've only played DS, 8, and a little bit of 9 at a friend's house though.
 
Count Bleck said:
"O hai, I'm going to just wreck everything and steal a princess, pardon me"
That's pretty much Bowser in a nutshell. Despite the fact that he comes up with the same boring, repetitive plans almost every time, he still gets next to nothing but praise among the fans, where they constantly drone on about how "awesome" and "badass" he is. Somehow, he also managed to win the "Best Video Game Villain of All Time" award in the gamer's edition of the Guinness World Records, further proving my point on how overrated he is. How Bowser, of all people, managed to get such an award is beyond me.
 
Knuckles the Echidna said:
Somehow, he also managed to win the "Best Video Game Villain of All Time" award in the gamer's edition of the Guinness World Records, further proving my point on how overrated he is

That's insane
 
No, how could he win best villain of all time? Because he appears in lots of games?

I can name 10 villains in my head better than Bowser.
 
Pffft. There are tons of better villains than Bowser, even within the same series. Every one of the RPG villains had him outclassed.
 
Baby Luigi said:
No, how could he win best villain of all time? Because he appears in lots of games?

I can name 10 villains in my head better than Bowser.
I can name 10 Mario villains.
Fawful
Dimentio
Count Bleck
Cackletta
Popple
Shroobs
X-Nauts
Shadow Queen
Doopliss
Mr. L
Antasma

They actually had organized plans for the most part. Those who didn't were justified by being side villains. Primary antagonists, however, should have organized evil plans.

EDIT: Crap I named 11. Proves my point even more, lol
 
To be fair, Doopliss, Popple, and Mr. L weren't the main villains in any of their respective games, nor were they trying to rule the world, destroy it, or anything of the sort, so comparing them to Bowser is kind of like comparing apples to oranges. I'm definitely in agreement about the others, though. Pretty much every one of them came up with plans that are far better than anything Bowser ever has. I guess Antasma's a bit of a special case, since they gave him little to no time to shine or develop as a character. Even so, I still consider him to be the real villain of Dream Team, since all Bowser basically did was leech off of his work.
 
Count Bleck said:
Baby Luigi said:
No, how could he win best villain of all time? Because he appears in lots of games?

I can name 10 villains in my head better than Bowser.
I can name 10 Mario villains.
Fawful
Dimentio
Count Bleck
Cackletta
Popple
Shroobs
X-Nauts
Shadow Queen
Doopliss
Mr. L
Antasma

They actually had organized plans for the most part. Those who didn't were justified by being side villains. Primary antagonists, however, should have organized evil plans.

EDIT: Crap I named 11. Proves my point even more, lol
I liked Bowser in the RPGs (with 1 obvious exception)
 
Thermidor 2 said:
ernesth100 said:
Well he did kill hundreds of toads in SMB3
I believe he's also the main villain in Donkey Kong Jr.
He's also the main villain in Mario Kart Wii and Mario Party because he murdered beloved CPU characters multiple times.
 
Back