Kyoko Sakura
Celestial Guide
Is there a scientific difference between microevolution and macroevolution? I'd like to believe in microevolution but I've heard countless claims that you'd have to believe n either both or neither.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Order of events VS length of events is debatable. (Or some Christians believe it to be debatable.) Some say that the "first 7 days" (or 6 days, whatever) were actually periods of time, not days. Some people say that when it says "forty" in the bible it's supposed to mean "many." (Although looking through the Hebrew words in e-Sword tells me that it really WAS supposed to mean "forty.")Post-Damage Invincibility said:Aren't evangelicals Young Earth Creationists?
Post-Damage Invincibility said:Does evolution HAVE to mean that men descended from apes?
Well said, my friend, well said.Hypnotoad said:My thought on it is that there isn't even "believing" in evolution--it's a real thing proved by science, just like gravity and all those other goodies. There is absolutely none of that "well my bible says it's not real, so I can ignore it." It's there. You can see it, science can explain it. In addition, the definition of evolution evolves itself, as more evidence flows in and changes thoughts. This does not render it wrong.
That being said, evolution being a real thing that exists does not mean that a God must not exist by definition. Both can co-exist.
A scientist dude I recommend listening to about these sorts of things is Neil deGrasse Tyson. He's marvelous~
Jack Noir said:well, I haven't seen any completely certain proof for evolution so I'm reluctant to go with that
it still has a bunch of holes that need plugging.
[me=Jack_Noir]looks for some popcorn[/me]Troy & Abed in the Morning said:Don't worry. Within a few days, the real dumbasses will come out of the woodwork and we'll have a lovely old flame war on our hands.
> Says there are holes in EvolutionJack Noir said:not getting into that, oh no
[me=Jack_Noir]looks for some popcorn[/me]Troy & Abed in the Morning said:Don't worry. Within a few days, the real dumbasses will come out of the woodwork and we'll have a lovely old flame war on our hands.
I do believe that too.Chihiro Fujisaki said:I believe in reincarnation. That's a kind of evolution !!
You know, I didn't take you for the irrationally intolerant kind of atheist. Do you hate me because I'm Buddhist? Judging from this post, it's likely that you do.Pi said:Well, I put 'Atheism Evolution'. Not that there ever was such a thing called that, but whatever.
And I am so tempted to fill this post with videos from an excellent YouTube user named thunderf00t, a user who has made a whole video-series that currently has 37 parts called Why do people laugh at creationists? in which he points out the hilarious claims that creationists make, including the following:
Anyway, since I apparently really want you to watch this, here's part one of Why do people laugh at creationists?:
- The world being beneath a canopy of water;
- The Grand Canyon being shaped in five minutes;
- God existing;
- Evolution happen by 'mere chance' and that there is a 'probability' of everything happening.
so how did it happen?Makoto Naegi said:^ no. thats the same as saying lions and felines evolved from a common ancestor.
Rat said: