This is what I thoughtThe 45th Sith Lord said:I thought nude pictures weren't allowed...
EDIT: I have a NationStates issue that relates to this!
Vocal members of the Moral Minority have been complaining and petitioning the government about the new art gallery displaying several provocative nude portraits by several famous artists. Moral Minority members claim these pieces of work promote prostitution and indecent sexual acts.
The Debate
"Stop my children from looking at smut! These artists are only perverts pretending to be artists! Think of the children!" says Stefanie Better, proud member of Parents Promoting Purity. "These artists are only going to rouse our innocent children to commit grotesque acts of immorality! Get rid of it all!"
"Well, I see that point, but we certainly don't need to ban inoffensive art, still lifes of inanimate objects, and such," says your sister, Doris Suzuki. "Perhaps we should set some guidelines for what is acceptable as art and what isn't. Artistic renditions of people getting it on are one thing. A bunch of fruit in a decorative bowl is another entirely."
"That is censorship!" says noted art history teacher Jake Falopian. "You can't ban art! It's freedom of expression; it's part of our culture. If anything, the government should be supporting these artists and their work, not listening to these prudish whackjobs who are scared of a little bare skin!"