Re: Mario Kart 8
I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jack McCoy said:I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
Anser said:Now I don't see Rosalina as a space goddess or something, but more like one more princess of the bunch in the Mario series.
Besides, Pink Gold Peach. WTF. At least Metal Mario existed before as a power-up, but Pink Gold Peach doesn't even make sense.
Once again they left E. Gadd, Lubba and other potential characters who could have worked.
Anser said:Jack McCoy said:I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
I get your useless sarcasm here. I never said it was not going to be fun, hence why I said I'll still get it. That doesn't change the fact that I'm disappointed by the roster, which is, at least for me, one of the most important aspects in a game.
I know right I mean whoring a character out in a Mario game. This is unprecedented. I mean I can't believe they would make a baby version of a popular character I mean they've never ever done that before. And just think about the consequences to the great and valued canon of the mario series why this is as controversial as when they added the baby brothers to the Mario Golf 64 roster thus rendering the plot of all the Yoshi games null and void in the eyes of the canonAnser said:Jack McCoy said:I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
I get your useless sarcasm here. I never said it was not going to be fun, hence why I said I'll still get it. That doesn't change the fact that I'm disappointed by the roster, which is, at least for me, one of the most important aspects in a game.
Morty said:I'm guessing Pink Gold Peach gives us another female option for a heavyweight character? She just seems like a metal-version of Peach, like you said with Mario, but made more 'girly' with pink so no big deal.
Jack McCoy said:I know right I mean whoring a character out in a Mario game. This is unprecedented. I mean I can't believe they would make a baby version of a popular character I mean they've never ever done that before. And just think about the consequences to the great and valued canon of the mario series why this is as controversial as when they added the baby brothers to the Mario Golf 64 roster thus rendering the plot of all the Yoshi games null and void in the eyes of the canonAnser said:Jack McCoy said:I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
I get your useless sarcasm here. I never said it was not going to be fun, hence why I said I'll still get it. That doesn't change the fact that I'm disappointed by the roster, which is, at least for me, one of the most important aspects in a game.
Anser said:Morty said:I'm guessing Pink Gold Peach gives us another female option for a heavyweight character? She just seems like a metal-version of Peach, like you said with Mario, but made more 'girly' with pink so no big deal.
Honey Queen? Or maybe someone who is not just a cheap recolor of another existing character?
Morty said:I think you're the first person I've seen suggest Honey Queen in a vaguely positive light, and I can assume that because of the general opinion of that character that's the reason why Pink Gold Peach is there and not Honey Queen. If "cheap recolor of another character" was a problem, then Metal Mario, (early) Luigi, and Daisy ("BUT SHE'S A TOMBOY!!!!!") wouldn't exist.
I think it is. He also does have a point, if they were worried about canon baby characters would never be in spin-offs, or any game with their adult counterparts.Anser said:Jack McCoy said:I know right I mean whoring a character out in a Mario game. This is unprecedented. I mean I can't believe they would make a baby version of a popular character I mean they've never ever done that before. And just think about the consequences to the great and valued canon of the mario series why this is as controversial as when they added the baby brothers to the Mario Golf 64 roster thus rendering the plot of all the Yoshi games null and void in the eyes of the canonAnser said:Jack McCoy said:I know right these two characters totally killed any chance that this game will ever be fun
I get your useless sarcasm here. I never said it was not going to be fun, hence why I said I'll still get it. That doesn't change the fact that I'm disappointed by the roster, which is, at least for me, one of the most important aspects in a game.
Go away with your annoying sarcasm, okay? You're not funny.
You're joking right?fantanoice said:Baby Rosalina is Mario multiverse confirmed :v
How are you meant to pronounce it then?Super Smash Misty said:The guy in the direct calls Ludwig "Loodwig"
BAHAHAHA
fantanoice said:
Ragna the Bloodedge said:i think baby waluigi would have been a better use of a character slot than pink gold peach
Super Smash Misty said:The guy in the direct calls Ludwig "Loodwig"
BAHAHAHA
Only if you're American. :PPresident Madagascar said:Tbh I don't really care because I will be driving Lakitu exclusively anyways, and you are driving on the friggin' ISS on Nitro Rainbow Road.
Super Smash Misty said:The guy in the direct calls Ludwig "Loodwig"
BAHAHAHA
That's actually the correct pronounciation.
But there are so many characters in the Mario universe who are unique who would be lightweights. And why would villains just be heavyweights? I think we need more evil medium and lightweights. We also need villains who are unrelated to Bowser, but that's for another day.Purple Yoshi said:Oh, I just wanted to say, for those people who are wondering why they keep putting baby characters in Mario Kart, it's so they can have more lightweight characters. After all, you can add more villains as heavyweights and normal characters as mediumweight, but it's a bit harder to put characters in the lightweight class without making...well...a smaller version of them.
At least, that's my theory.
Dreamy Fawful said:But there are so many characters in the Mario universe who are unique who would be lightweights. And why would villains just be heavyweights? I think we need more evil medium and lightweights. We also need villains who are unrelated to Bowser, but that's for another day.Purple Yoshi said:Oh, I just wanted to say, for those people who are wondering why they keep putting baby characters in Mario Kart, it's so they can have more lightweight characters. After all, you can add more villains as heavyweights and normal characters as mediumweight, but it's a bit harder to put characters in the lightweight class without making...well...a smaller version of them.
At least, that's my theory.
Source please.Anser said:According to IGN there are still some characters to be revealed but it's obvious they're referring to the classic ones like Birdo, Bowser Jr, King Boo, Diddy Kong, Dry Bones and someone else, maybe Honey Queen or Wiggler.
This. A thousand times, this.Dreamy Fawful said:We also need villains who are unrelated to Bowser