Mario and Luigi: Dream Team

GalacticPetey said:
But Sticker Star was not fun.
Yeah it is. The gameplay is wayyyyyy underrated.
 
> no, I feel like this plot will be awesome. It looks just like the past games!

Plot? According to the opening story and Nintendo's past behavior pattern, it won't go that far. And I don't really see other characters who didn't appear in previous three games are likely to appear this time (a ruler often got amnesia attack when sending invitations).

Unless like someone said, you may meet others you know in the Dream World. Sleep and dream are interesting, but they probably make most good to gameplay.
 
I hope it would have all that made the other RPG's fun, like the plot ETC... I wonder how different it is to have a different view, in 3D.
 
Paper Mario Sticker Star conpletely removed the RPG the other Paper mario series had. I hope that this one will have not completely changed.
 
All I know is, this game has already proven to me that it is better than Sticker Star, because battles give experience, and the villain is new. Plus we have returning M&L characters like Broque!
 
A comparison with the worst example is lamentable.
It would be a nice game, but I don't really see an impprovement beside the 3D enhancement.
 
The game visuals would be a surefire improvement, even without taking the 3D enhancement into account.
 
Lord Spongeful said:
All I know is, this game has already proven to me that it is better than Sticker Star, because battles give experience, and the villain is new. Plus we have returning M&L characters like Broque!

Everything he said, my thoughts exactly.
 
Easy about what I think of this:AWESOME
I´m an RPG an action games fan, and well a Nintendo and Sony videogame-fanatic...I just want to know all the story of this game, play in the new edition of sprites of Mario and Luigi and complete the game atleast 90% complete
 
Antasma looks like a mixture of Cackletta, Elder Princess Shroob, and the Dark Star.

She minus well be called Dark Elder Princess Cackletta. xP
 
I am happy about the new Mario & Luigi game, it is my 3rd fav RPG series, ;D It looks really intresting with new graphics, I feel that i am the only one who thinks Antasma is some strange dream combination of Cackletta and Princess Shroob? :eek:
 
Kingfawful4321 said:
I feel that i am the only one who thinks Antasma is some strange dream combination of Cackletta and Princess Shroob? :eek:

Um, there were posts that are JUST above you saying the exact things
 
Maybe not yet
 
Unless you can find more than just filler information to put about that character, than I would wait until the game came out. You would only be making a stub about the page, and you might want to find more information before you make a page about it.
 
cryoAwakening said:
You would only be making a stub about the page, and you might want to find more information before you make a page about it.

Hello, it won't be a stub if it's short. Especially if it lacks information because it's from an upcoming game. There's a reason we put a green template on subjects that are related to unreleased games.

But even then, all we know about it is that it exists. It's probably the reason we didn't make Mario Kart U, Super Mario U, or Super Smash Bros. U articles yet
 
Baby Luigi said:
cryoAwakening said:
You would only be making a stub about the page, and you might want to find more information before you make a page about it.

Hello, it won't be a stub if it's short. Especially if it lacks information because it's from an upcoming game. There's a reason we put a green template on subjects that are related to unreleased games.

But even then, all we know about it is that it exists. It's probably the reason we didn't make Mario Kart U, Super Mario U, or Super Smash Bros. U articles yet

It would be a stub if it was just a one- or two-sentence article about how this person and all it is stating if it was a pillow being, describing how it looks, and appears in Mario & Luigi: Dream Team.

Just because a green template is put on doesn't exclude the fact that it is a stub, because stub is a page that is lacking information, which technicially it is.
 
But it doesn't really lack information if we don't know anything about it anyway. I don't think the information is sufficient, and a stub's definition is "an article that lacks sufficient information.

But I digress...
 
It's an Article on an unofficial website, saying something that's probably not even officially confirmed.
I wouldn't trust it yet, unless it's confirmed.
 
Back