Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Garrus Vakarian said:Hey guys, why don't you stop freaking out. It isn't confirmed, it is a goddang rumor.
Rumors like this come out every time a new system is announced.
Purple Yoshi said:As for the always online thing, it's going to make multiplayer a necessity in every new game. What happened to good old single player games?
Baby Luigi said:Purple Yoshi said:As for the always online thing, it's going to make multiplayer a necessity in every new game. What happened to good old single player games?
Not necessarily; there are still some games out there that has required online to play but still has single player campaigns. I'm sure that these games will probably have both multiplayer and single player stuff. I think that's actually the reason many complain about the required online thing: many want to play the single player game without even having to connect to online.
I've played SMG on Wii and MW3 on Xbox,imo Xbox does have better graphics.Lord Spongeful said:Meh, I only get Nintendo systems so I don't particularily care, but I hope the Wii U can still shine with the new Xbox and PS4 out, because everyone at my school hated the Wii because "the graphics aren't as good." They apparently haven't played Super Mario Galaxy.
Lord Spongeful said:They apparently haven't played Super Mario Galaxy.
Baby Luigi said:Lord Spongeful said:They apparently haven't played Super Mario Galaxy.
Super Mario Galaxy has ----ty graphics, that's probably the reason they know that Xbox and PS have better graphics.
I always wondered. Are those toads dark skinned (a.k.a brown skinned) or is it just their shadow or shade.Baby Luigi said:Until you see this:
And oatmealy plants
La Marionette said:You also have to keep in mind that realistic graphics don't mean better graphics compared to fantasy. What makes graphics good is if the texture quality is good and the models are nicely shaped and animated.
chillv said:Graphics rarely matter in a video game. The game can look like crap. If it's fun, then that's what matters.
I was only exaggerating. Graphics do play a part in a games quality and they should be made to the best of the artist's ability. However, it shouldn't be the main thing taken to heart during development but, they should at least make them look presentable even in it's beta form. That way, if you show it to E3 or PAX or something, your game will look at least okay.La Marionette said:chillv said:Graphics rarely matter in a video game. The game can look like crap. If it's fun, then that's what matters.
Nope, graphics do matter, especially after you nail the gameplay part of it. I think graphics is part of the difference between what makes a good game and a great game. Sure, the gameplay is the most important aspect of a video game, but good, beautiful graphics really polish the game. Good graphics add a breathtaking feel to the game, and I like to appreciate the beautiful, interesting surroundings as I immerse in the game.
New Super Mario Bros. U, for instance, is a pretty fun game, but the visuals look like crap. The boring art style in that game has contributed my "meh" feeling for this game. Meanwhile, Rayman Origins has downright beautiful visuals and music that has probably set my expectations higher for the next Mario game. Good, beautifully done graphics show how much care and effort game developers have devoted to, while bad graphics show laziness.
chillv said:I was only exaggerating. Graphics do play a part in a games quality and they should be made to the best of the artist's ability. However, it shouldn't be the main thing taken to heart during development but, they should at least make them look presentable even in it's beta form. That way, if you show it to E3 or PAX or something, your game will look at least okay.La Marionette said:chillv said:Graphics rarely matter in a video game. The game can look like crap. If it's fun, then that's what matters.
Nope, graphics do matter, especially after you nail the gameplay part of it. I think graphics is part of the difference between what makes a good game and a great game. Sure, the gameplay is the most important aspect of a video game, but good, beautiful graphics really polish the game. Good graphics add a breathtaking feel to the game, and I like to appreciate the beautiful, interesting surroundings as I immerse in the game.
New Super Mario Bros. U, for instance, is a pretty fun game, but the visuals look like crap. The boring art style in that game has contributed my "meh" feeling for this game. Meanwhile, Rayman Origins has downright beautiful visuals and music that has probably set my expectations higher for the next Mario game. Good, beautifully done graphics show how much care and effort game developers have devoted to, while bad graphics show laziness.
The early beta version of Super Smash Bros is a good example of what I am talking about.
La Marionette said:chillv said:I was only exaggerating. Graphics do play a part in a games quality and they should be made to the best of the artist's ability. However, it shouldn't be the main thing taken to heart during development but, they should at least make them look presentable even in it's beta form. That way, if you show it to E3 or PAX or something, your game will look at least okay.La Marionette said:chillv said:Graphics rarely matter in a video game. The game can look like crap. If it's fun, then that's what matters.
Nope, graphics do matter, especially after you nail the gameplay part of it. I think graphics is part of the difference between what makes a good game and a great game. Sure, the gameplay is the most important aspect of a video game, but good, beautiful graphics really polish the game. Good graphics add a breathtaking feel to the game, and I like to appreciate the beautiful, interesting surroundings as I immerse in the game.
New Super Mario Bros. U, for instance, is a pretty fun game, but the visuals look like crap. The boring art style in that game has contributed my "meh" feeling for this game. Meanwhile, Rayman Origins has downright beautiful visuals and music that has probably set my expectations higher for the next Mario game. Good, beautifully done graphics show how much care and effort game developers have devoted to, while bad graphics show laziness.
The early beta version of Super Smash Bros is a good example of what I am talking about.
In the internet, it is difficult to tell if one if exaggerating or telling one's opinion.
There are a lot of early beta versions of Super Smash Bros. I am not sure which is the one you're thinking of.
Anyway, we're discussing about Xbox and crap.
Yeah, I apologize if I misquoted anything about the PS and XBOX systems. I don't own a PS1 or an XBOX but I own a PS2 and XBOX 360.Toad Eightyfive said:Live was actually carried over from the original Xbox, and if I remember correctly the PS1 could only play CDs.