Should Square Enix give Geno to Nintendo?

Should Square Enix give Geno to Nintendo?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 12 25.0%
  • No.

    Votes: 9 18.8%
  • Maybe.

    Votes: 2 4.2%
  • Yes,but only for Super Smash Bros.4.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't care.

    Votes: 21 43.8%
  • Square should keep him but only if they use him.

    Votes: 4 8.3%

  • Total voters
    48

yamirah

Goomba
So what do you guys think?I really don't care. :posh:
 
I wouldn't mind, but something tells me that even if Nintendo did have the rights to Geno, they still wouldn't use him. Just look at how many characters they've neglected already, and still continue to do so up to this day.
 
No. We don't want to reinforce whiners.
 
I don't even get why people are obsessed with Geno, he's such a minor character.
 
Square isn't just going to give Geno to them, they're gonna want cash. Even so it really doesn't matter since I don't see how they could make Geno work in a current Mario game.
 
I don't care unless the game developers give Baby Luigi the opportunity to kick his butt
 
Yamirah, your name sounds a lot like my actual name, but with an "R" sound, instead of "LL".
 
MKGirlism said:
Yamirah, your name sounds a lot like my actual name, but with an "R" sound, instead of "LL".

It sounds like a Japanese romanization of your name
 
Anser said:
Why are people so freaking obsessed over Geno? GET OVER HIM ALREADY, for God's sake.

I have no idea why they're obsessed but what you're saying is that's like saying "GET OVER HIM ALREADY" to Baby Luigi for me
 
Yeah, why don't you, BalloonLagoonsOverFeebleness a.k.a. BabyLuigiOnFire get over it, pal?

At least the ugly baby is playable in a few more games than Geno. Plus, he plays a much more important role in representing Mario than Geno.
 
Australians on this Forums might hate me for that, but:
 
no.

As far as im concerned geno is pretty worthless and just not very interesting. I like the design sure but he never really appealed to me in the slightest.

Hell id rather see the babies and i dont even like them.
 
Bowser45 said:
I don't even get why people are obsessed with Geno, he's such a minor character.
Anser said:
Why are people so freaking obsessed over Geno? GET OVER HIM ALREADY, for God's sake.
I think he's cool but I think people should at least stop asking for him in Smash Bros. He was only in one game of the Mario series,I don't think he deserves it.
MKGirlism said:
Yamirah, your name sounds a lot like my actual name, but with an "R" sound, instead of "LL".
Cool.If I'm saying it right,it sounds cool.
 
Fawfulthegreat64 said:
Definitely. If it means "RPG character" will stop being a label that means "never use in a spinoff or main game," then hell yes.

But, RPG characters are in spinoffs, right? And what about Mario Party 5 and 6? :P
 
Mario Party X said:
Fawfulthegreat64 said:
Definitely. If it means "RPG character" will stop being a label that means "never use in a spinoff or main game," then hell yes.

But, RPG characters are in spinoffs, right? And what about Mario Party 5 and 6? :P
There have been very few exceptions though.
 
I don't care
*NSY leaves thread
 
You have to make two things clear : what happened to Geno, and what do you wish to happen to Geno in the future.

Your surmise sounds like that Geno didn't have more things to do because SE owns him. The surmise itself is weird in two points: one is Geno never appears in any other SE games (including ones made with Nintendo) like Banjo and Conker. If he had became an important regular in FF games, nothing to complain.
The second is, like many others said, even if SE didn't make this game, now all RPG characters face difficulties of making a second appearance in Mario games.

More seriously, Geno was a kind of character very similar with Tippi that can't fit in more stories due to their important destinies. It's okay if you pick Mallow or others, but picking Geno only sounds like you want to favor him no matter how things are.


Honestly, I don't like the fact that Geno is always referred. Not only showing one kind of partiality, but just making him more and more infamous in forum discussion.
 
Solar Blaze said:
Just look at how many characters they've neglected already, and still continue to do so up to this day.

to be fair, they were all boring characters, pretty much

also i don't care much for geno and i don't care what happens to him
 
DCI Gene Hunt said:
to be fair, they were all boring characters, pretty much
They weren't any more or less boring than some of the average drones they've used in the spin-offs as of late.
 
Back