Next Paper Mario game (Likely on Wii U)

I said they already made something worse than SPM

I never said SPM was bad.
 
Cirdec said:
When you say A is worse than B you imply B is bad.
Click to expand...

He/She gets it.
 
Well sorry but I didn't mean it that way. I will say I can understand people who think SPM is the worst of the first three (although I prefer it)

I just can't fathom an opinion that Sticker Star is better in any way, because at least SPM follows most traditions set up by the previous games: Merlon clan, Pit of 100 Trials, tons of side content, a story that's more than your average kidnapping plot, original characters besides one annoying partner, etc
 
Stanley the Troll said:
I just can't fathom an opinion that Sticker Star is better in any way, because at least SPM follows most traditions set up by the previous games: Merlon clan, Pit of 100 Trials, tons of side content, a story that's more than your average kidnapping plot, original characters besides one annoying partner, etc
Click to expand...

Anything about gameplay other than side-content?
 
*plays broken record detailing my thoughts on SPM*
 
Cirdec said:
When you say A is worse than B you imply B is bad.
Click to expand...
Wario is worse than Mario, so therefore I imply that Mario is bad to begin with.

What kind of logic is this!?

I believe that this is "reading between the lines".
 
Mario Party X said:
Cirdec said:
When you say A is worse than B you imply B is bad.
Click to expand...
Wario is worse than Mario, so therefore I imply that Mario is bad to begin with.

What kind of logic is this!?

I believe that this is "reading between the lines".
Click to expand...

Worse means more bad so by saying A is more bad than B, you think B is bad.
So you have to say A is less good than B if you think B is good.
 
I don't think that's how logic works.

Also, I believe context is everything anyway, and judging from the context, Fawful, The Great 64, loves Super Paper Mario, but if he said that Sticker Star is worse than Super Paper Mario, that invalidates his opinion and makes him a liar? Worse is what is means, you don't need to establish that something is bad to begin with to have something else worse than it.

Stanley the Troll said:
Well sorry but I didn't mean it that way. I will say I can understand people who think SPM is the worst of the first three (although I prefer it)
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, it's people using faulty logic to discredit your opinions.
 
Stanley the Troll said:
Well sorry but I didn't mean it that way. I will say I can understand people who think SPM is the worst of the first three (although I prefer it)

I just can't fathom an opinion that Sticker Star is better in any way, because at least SPM follows most traditions set up by the previous games: Merlon clan, Pit of 100 Trials, tons of side content, a story that's more than your average kidnapping plot, original characters besides one annoying partner, etc
Click to expand...

idk how ss is but spm was just too damn boring

terrible gameplay, lacking battle customization of the first two games, horrible character designs aside from maybe bleck and dimentio, effortless difficulty, shit side content, 3d flip was repetitive and uninteresting

probably the only good things was being able to play as peach, the music, and the storyline to some degree

a shame to the series that ive played, and an even bigger shame to all platformer rpgs
 
I'll live if Paper Mario was laid to rest. I'll always think of it as a trilogy
 
Mario Party X said:
I don't think that's how logic works.

Also, I believe context is everything anyway, and judging from the context, Fawful, The Great 64, loves Super Paper Mario, but if he said that Sticker Star is worse than Super Paper Mario, that invalidates his opinion and makes him a liar? Worse is what is means, you don't need to establish that something is bad to begin with to have something else worse than it.

Stanley the Troll said:
Well sorry but I didn't mean it that way. I will say I can understand people who think SPM is the worst of the first three (although I prefer it)
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, it's people using faulty logic to discredit your opinions.
Click to expand...

Really it was just me poking fun of his grammar within the context of the situation.
 
Stanley the Troll said:
They know that fans hated Sticker Star. If they make another Sticker Star after knowing that then they're dead to me.
Click to expand...
Most reviews I've seen rate PMSS as mediocre, not exactly bad.
EGM: 6.5/10
Game Informer: 8.75/10
Gamespot:7.5/10
IGN: 8.3/10
Digital Spy (3/5) said:
Writing is sharp and legitimately funny at times. [The game] has a lot of charm and personality [but] stalls horribly as you backtrack and replay level after level, trying to figure out what you're missing. It's often unclear where Mario needs to go to progress, and these moments end up being frustrating and ruin the flow of the story."
Click to expand...
AIAS named it Handheld Game of the Year (though there weren't many memorable handheld games in 2012)
 
lol, not even mediocre. DECENT. It's at worst, simply not good (GameExplain gave the lowest score I believe), while lower scores, if anything else, hang by the mediocre range. I consider 7.0/10 a decent game with flaws, but still decent.
 
Decent is the best way to describe it really. Anyone who says its absolutely terrible has never played a truly bad game.
 
Stanley the Troll said:
It spits on the face of the good Paper Mario games, therefore it's terrible to Paper Mario fans.

I've played Sonic 06.
Click to expand...
Immense disappointing is more like it, and yeah, it's true that some Paper Mario fans try to refuse it exists, just as how Devil May Cry fans pretend that Devil May Cry 2 doesn't exist.

Weird analogy, but it makes sense if you ever played those games (which, I'm taking a wild guess, Fawfulthegreat64, you haven't).
 
Stanley the Troll said:
It spits on the face of the good Paper Mario games, therefore it's terrible to Paper Mario fans.

I've played Sonic 06.
Click to expand...

Doesn't make it objectively a terrible game. And before anyone plays the opinion card, no objectively terrible games do exist.
 
For the record I didn't find Sonic 06 half bad. But then again I've maybe played 3 sonic games in my life.

And isn't this whole argument based on opinions.
 
Stanley the Troll said:
For the record I didn't find Sonic 06 half bad. But then again I've maybe played 3 sonic games in my life.

And isn't this whole argument based on opinions.
Click to expand...

No. Its a fact that the game is mediocre at worst, no matter how much outrage anyone tries to use to justify it.

Same for Sonic 06 being horse crap.
 
Sonic 06 is a worse game than Sticker Star because Sticker Star isn't laden with hilarious bugs, fps drops, and an ugly hub world.
 
I wouldn't really call Bowser short. Technically he towers over most of the characters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back