Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mario Party 9 is a worthless cash-grab attempt on NDCube's part so of course its going to be selling for lower.Cirdec said:I saw Mario Party 8 being more expensive than Mario Party 9. Bull*bleep* as well.
At least his mind aknowledges that Mario party 9 is no good.Kart Player 2008 said:Mario Party 9 is a worthless cash-grab attempt on NDCube's part so of course its going to be selling for lower.Cirdec said:I saw Mario Party 8 being more expensive than Mario Party 9. Bull*bleep* as well.
Dorumon said:At least his mind aknowledges that Mario party 9 is no good.Kart Player 2008 said:Mario Party 9 is a worthless cash-grab attempt on NDCube's part so of course its going to be selling for lower.Cirdec said:I saw Mario Party 8 being more expensive than Mario Party 9. Bull*bleep* as well.
The original game was meant for an ANALOG STICK, do you not see the problem with remaking it for a system that DID NOT HAVE AN ANALOG STICK?Ninelevendo said:What was wrong with the controls? The controls were fine.Birdo said:It was barely worth $30 when it came out.Kart Player 2008 said:To be fair Super Mario 64 DS is a good enough game to be worth the full $30 you have to pay for it, even today.Birdo said:Not really related but I saw Super Mario 64 DS at Toys R Us a few months ago, it was still like $30.
IT IS 10 YEARS OLD.
WHY IS IT NOT LIKE $5 BY NOW.
Who the *bleep* at Nintendo thought remaking a game that required an analog stick to a system that didn't have one was a good idea?
I don't see the problem at all.Birdo said:The original game was meant for an ANALOG STICK, do you not see the problem with remaking it for a system that DID NOT HAVE AN ANALOG STICK?Ninelevendo said:What was wrong with the controls? The controls were fine.Birdo said:It was barely worth $30 when it came out.Kart Player 2008 said:To be fair Super Mario 64 DS is a good enough game to be worth the full $30 you have to pay for it, even today.Birdo said:Not really related but I saw Super Mario 64 DS at Toys R Us a few months ago, it was still like $30.
IT IS 10 YEARS OLD.
WHY IS IT NOT LIKE $5 BY NOW.
Who the *bleep* at Nintendo thought remaking a game that required an analog stick to a system that didn't have one was a good idea?
Lol I bought MP9 the week it came out for half the price of 8.Cirdec said:I saw Mario Party 8 being more expensive than Mario Party 9. Bullshit as well.
Have fun with your inferior control scheme.Ninelevendo said:I don't see the problem at all.Birdo said:The original game was meant for an ANALOG STICK, do you not see the problem with remaking it for a system that DID NOT HAVE AN ANALOG STICK?Ninelevendo said:What was wrong with the controls? The controls were fine.Birdo said:It was barely worth $30 when it came out.Kart Player 2008 said:To be fair Super Mario 64 DS is a good enough game to be worth the full $30 you have to pay for it, even today.Birdo said:Not really related but I saw Super Mario 64 DS at Toys R Us a few months ago, it was still like $30.
IT IS 10 YEARS OLD.
WHY IS IT NOT LIKE $5 BY NOW.
Who the *bleep* at Nintendo thought remaking a game that required an analog stick to a system that didn't have one was a good idea?
As a matter of fact, I did.Birdo said:Have fun with your inferior control scheme.Ninelevendo said:I don't see the problem at all.Birdo said:The original game was meant for an ANALOG STICK, do you not see the problem with remaking it for a system that DID NOT HAVE AN ANALOG STICK?Ninelevendo said:What was wrong with the controls? The controls were fine.Birdo said:It was barely worth $30 when it came out.Kart Player 2008 said:To be fair Super Mario 64 DS is a good enough game to be worth the full $30 you have to pay for it, even today.Birdo said:Not really related but I saw Super Mario 64 DS at Toys R Us a few months ago, it was still like $30.
IT IS 10 YEARS OLD.
WHY IS IT NOT LIKE $5 BY NOW.
Who the *bleep* at Nintendo thought remaking a game that required an analog stick to a system that didn't have one was a good idea?
Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft.Ninelevendo said:As a matter of fact, I did.Birdo said:Have fun with your inferior control scheme.Ninelevendo said:I don't see the problem at all.Birdo said:The original game was meant for an ANALOG STICK, do you not see the problem with remaking it for a system that DID NOT HAVE AN ANALOG STICK?Ninelevendo said:What was wrong with the controls? The controls were fine.Birdo said:It was barely worth $30 when it came out.Kart Player 2008 said:To be fair Super Mario 64 DS is a good enough game to be worth the full $30 you have to pay for it, even today.Birdo said:Not really related but I saw Super Mario 64 DS at Toys R Us a few months ago, it was still like $30.
IT IS 10 YEARS OLD.
WHY IS IT NOT LIKE $5 BY NOW.
Who the *bleep* at Nintendo thought remaking a game that required an analog stick to a system that didn't have one was a good idea?
Have fun with your invalid complaint.
lolNinelevendo said:That was a very Birdo-like noise.