Zelda and Tri
Mushroom Attendant
- Pronouns
- She/her
Either Option 6 or 8. Nintendo should keep on producing high-quality Mario content, but should also try to keep each new title exciting and fresh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've played Pokemon, Kirby, Pikmin, and Starfy. (he's not listed here sadly)New poll! This is the first time we've done a multi-choice poll, so you can pick multiple options if you play other Nintendo IPs!
Nintendo has many IPs other than Mario. Which Nintendo IPs do you play?
The Legend of Zelda
Pokémon
Kirby
Fire Emblem
Metroid
Star Fox
Pikmin
Splatoon
Xenoblade
Other
I don't play other Nintendo IPs
I did play Zelda, Pokemon, Kirby, Xenoblade, and Animal Crossing(not listed...forgot it should be listed considering how huge it is)(i added it nvm)
Everything in bold is something that I've played at least one game in the franchise of (which really I didn't need to do that because it's basically all of this). Other than that I've played Animal Crossing, Earthbound, F-Zero, and probably other things that aren't listed on hereNintendo has many IPs other than Mario. Which Nintendo IPs do you play?
The Legend of Zelda
Pokémon
Kirby
Fire Emblem
Metroid
Star Fox
Pikmin
Splatoon
Xenoblade
Other
I don't play other Nintendo IPs
Here is a question that has been pressing my mind: at any point would you allow a previously rejected member to join the 13th Committee by reapplying, assuming users on the Committee agree that sufficient growth and amends have been made from and for the rejection reasons? I know this greatly sounds related to my rejection but it's actually not at all. It just interested me that you said you would only accept new members once started if members on the Committee felt comfortable with it, and one could argue that every member in the Committee having a say in acceptance would be better than it being slightly closer to unilateral like with the beginning sign-ups, as they might know other facts about the applying user.Now, you may notice that the committee is short on members, despite having received more applications than the members I have selected. This is for a variety of factors, and anyone who did not "make the cut" had legitimate reasons for the rejection of their application, which I will be happy to share in private should they wish.
I don't really have an issue with someone wanting to re-apply, though it would definitely be up to the committee themselves. People can change over time.Here is a question that has been pressing my mind: at any point would you allow a previously rejected member to join the 13th Committee by reapplying, assuming users on the Committee agree that sufficient growth and amends have been made from and for the rejection reasons? I know this greatly sounds related to my rejection but it's actually not at all. It just interested me that you said you would only accept new members once started if members on the Committee felt comfortable with it, and one could argue that every member in the Committee having a say in acceptance would be better than it being slightly closer to unilateral like with the beginning sign-ups, as they might know other facts about the applying user.
This is kind of how I feel too. I'm not against free updates, and I actually liked the method back during the Splatoon 1 days when it was first introduced, but it really feels like the updates are coming at the expense of content in the base game, and I don't understand why they're still doing this when its ultimately leading to the online modes in the games just dying instead and sales dropping off a cliff after like, launch month because the games have no content.I do enjoy free stuff but the way Nintendo does it is unappealing. It always ends up resulting in a game that feels lacking in content and then by the time the update is released I don't care because I stopped playing since I already did everything the game had to offer in such a short time because there wasn't much to begin with
Hmm…I think I'm going to go with option 4. I'm not a fan of it, but if the updates add characters I like or new and interesting modes, I'm going to be happy with what we get in the future.Our first poll of the term is officially live, if you want to check it out. It's focused around Nintendo's recent choices with regards to game updates and content at launch, which is a rather hot-button issue these days to be sure.
I don't really have an issue with someone wanting to re-apply, though it would definitely be up to the committee themselves. People can change over time.
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing is a glitchy mess with a hyperspeed reversing truck, absolutely no AI, "You're Winner", and one of the tracks crashes the game.
I am aware of Big Rigs' small development team and cheapness. I was using it as an example to show what an unfinished game is like.Big Rigs was literally outsourced to some no-name Ukrainian developer and published by a company orders of magnitude smaller than Nintendo, known for publishing extremely cheap projects.
I never said that Battle League didn't have problems, I used the term "perfectly functional" which means "it works as it should".I don't know why you're using logical extremes to argue a point that there is no problem with a game. It's like saying, you can't criticize a game's content because much worse games exist. You can't criticize Mario Kart Tour's predatory monetization scheme when Dungeon Keeper Mobile exists. Did you know there are games worse than Big Rigs? You can't say it's bad because there are some games out there that require you to change some parameter in an .ini file to even function properly.