Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. I'm on for a MINIMUM of 6 hours a day. Now, I know that's still not "active all the time", but I still think that's pretty damn good.Psycho said:I'm still trying to figure out how we can deal with Uniju. His ban ends in 8 days and Ninji was the one whoyelled atdisaplened Uniju. Stoob's not active all the time, so if Uniju gets annoyed and becomes too out of control, we can't stop him.
I was going to say "no", but the mods haven't really had a chance to talk it over. So, I'll say, "not right now".Popple said:Can I be a mod?
Uniju's not Satan. It's not like he's going to kill you all.Jeff said:I'm still trying to figure out how we can deal with Uniju. His ban ends in 8 days and Ninji was the one whoyelled atdisaplened Uniju. Stoob's not active all the time, so if Uniju gets annoyed and becomes too out of control, we can't stop him.
He breaks his own rules and denies he ever did it. He gave me a warning for going off-topic in Mindless Junk (which is, according to the rules, ALLOWED). And lots more, which I'd get in trouble for telling you. After all, disagreeing with admins is a punishable offense here.Needlemouse said:...and why is that?ScarecrowPerson said:No, it won't... it'll be a whole lot better.Yoshario said:The forum won't be the same without you.
ScarecrowPerson said:He breaks his own rules and denies he ever did it.
He gave me a warning for going off-topic in Mindless Junk (which is, according to the rules, ALLOWED).
And lots more, which I'd get in trouble for telling you.
After all, disagreeing with admins is a punishable offense here.
ScarecrowPerson said:You want proof? Well, conveniently, you deleted the post where you broke your own rules.
You sent the warning to me via PM, so even if I put the content of the PM here, you would just say I
made it up.
So I can't prove it.
Sorry. I'd like to. It would give me immense satisfaction to prove it. But I can't.
To the other users who may read this and say I'm lying, think about this: What reason would I have to constantly argue with ChaosNinji if he never did anything to me?
And ChaosNinji has a very good reason to pretend he never did any of this stuff. Users would hate him even more than they do already, if they had proof he did it.
Fighter said:You know Ninji, you're not very good at this whole retirement thing. You know it involves leaving, right?
ScarecrowPerson said:I think he just wants to fight with me some more
So you admit you broke your own rules, despite denying it here and in PMs.ChaosNinji said:ScarecrowPerson said:You want proof? Well, conveniently, you deleted the post where you broke your own rules.
You agreed it should be deleted.
durr hurr
ScarecrowPerson said:So you admit you broke your own rules, despite denying it here and in PMs.
Mmmm.
Tell me straight: You did break your own rules, didn't you? And you lied about it. Don't avoid the question, answer me straight.ChaosNinji said:ScarecrowPerson said:So you admit you broke your own rules, despite denying it here and in PMs.
Mmmm.
So, you're using a resolved issue as ammo because you know that you're retarded and wrong.
Mmmm.
ScarecrowPerson said:Tell me straight: You did break your own rules, didn't you? And you lied about it. Don't avoid the question, answer me straight.
All I want is that you recieve a warning for flaming. You would have given me a warning if I had done what you did. So I believe it is fair that you recieve one.ChaosNinji said:ScarecrowPerson said:Tell me straight: You did break your own rules, didn't you? And you lied about it. Don't avoid the question, answer me straight.
Yes, I did in that scenario. I lied to you via PM when you asked because I was in no mood to argue with you.
Going to condemn me to hell for something that we resolved the day after I did it? You are only making yourself look worse.
ChaosNinji said:I was in no mood to argue with you.
...thereby implying that you had never done any such thing.Please, quote something instead of just rambling on and on without any proof.
ScarecrowPerson said:All I want is that you recieve a warning for flaming.
Also, we didn't "resolve" it. I pretended I was fine with it because
ChaosNinji said:I was in no mood to argue with you.
Okay! Fine then, I'll let this drop.ChaosNinji said:ScarecrowPerson said:All I want is that you recieve a warning for flaming.
I DID
ScarecrowPerson said:Okay! Fine then, I'll let this drop.
...but, uh, how should I have known that? I spoke to Stooben on this subject a while ago, and he acted as if you hadn't gotten a warning.
Of course, the fact that you admitted to lying to me in PM makes me wonder if you're just making this up in order to get me off of your back.
ScarecrowPerson said:Who would have known that you were warned, other than you?
I still believe that Uniju's banning was rather unjustified, and Snack's banning even more so. I overreacted saying that the forums hit rock bottom, but honestly, banning them was a pretty dumb thing to do. Yes, I know I was partially responsible for their ban on UP and yes, that was really *bleep*ing stupid of me too, and no, I'm not justifying what I did and yes, I can see why you did what you did and no, it was not the right thing to do.
So, let's get back on-topic. I said I'd drop this if you got a warning, so here I am, dropping it.