Hey, guys. I mentioned an alternative to the peer review system of voting for featured articles on the proposals page. I would like to head up the idea myself, but I'd rather get some specifics discussed first and, also, my life is a little wild right now and I can't design my life around the time scedules of the proposals section. If anyone feels strongly enough about this, please feel free to take what you see and make a proposal yourself. Anyway, here's the idea.
Problem: The peer review system isn't working.
Opposing Solutions: Do away with the featured article idea all together--This is a bad idea because it decreases the attention given to contributors.
My Solution: The FA Panel
How the FA Panel Would Work
*Members: one to three hand-picked contributors/sysops/moderators/etc. chosen by Wayoshi, Porple, or some other elite user.
*Their Job: To view the proposed FA's and rate each one from 1 to 10, giving an "Editorial Review" if they wish. Then, they come together and discuss which article they feel is most deserving of the honor. If there is conflict over the article, one should be assigned as the following FA and one for the current FA. However they sort that out is up to them.
*As Time Continues: If the task grows too great, the task could be cycled among the trusted users.
Problem: The peer review system isn't working.
Opposing Solutions: Do away with the featured article idea all together--This is a bad idea because it decreases the attention given to contributors.
My Solution: The FA Panel
How the FA Panel Would Work
*Members: one to three hand-picked contributors/sysops/moderators/etc. chosen by Wayoshi, Porple, or some other elite user.
*Their Job: To view the proposed FA's and rate each one from 1 to 10, giving an "Editorial Review" if they wish. Then, they come together and discuss which article they feel is most deserving of the honor. If there is conflict over the article, one should be assigned as the following FA and one for the current FA. However they sort that out is up to them.
*As Time Continues: If the task grows too great, the task could be cycled among the trusted users.