Suggestions for Improvement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Poliswag said:
PTR is on the list twice.
1. Mario and Luigi/Pokemon Trainer Red--> Red
2. Pokemon Trainer Red --> Pikachu

Goomba's Shoe is Diesel

Zero is Aquila

Spiny Master 347 is Latula Pyrope
Click to expand...

MKGirlism said:
I'm not on the list neither.
Click to expand...

Fixed all of this.

MCS said:
Also, my username and display name are both MCS now, so you should change MCSoulja to MCS.
Click to expand...

I removed you since users with a matching display name and username aren't listed.
 
So would the post removing thing/flags be feasible?
 
It would require some coding, but then it could be done.
 
As I've said before, the Delete/Undelete thing can't be done, but the Flags can be done quite easily.
 
In IRC the other day me, Turboo and some other people i think thought it would be good to have a rule about mini-modding.

No mini-modding. If you see someone breaking the rules, report it to a global moderator, rather than throwing in your own degrading comments towards the offender in question. Usually, for minor issues it's fine to subtly let the user know what they are doing is wrong, and referring them to the rules page is also an acceptable thing to do. But keep in mind that such situations are best left in the hands of the moderation team.
Click to expand...

I wrote this, and Turb said it looks good. We can't really think of anything to add if it was necessary, but yeah what does everyone else think?
 
Squawks the Parrot said:
In IRC the other day me, Turboo and some other people i think thought it would be good to have a rule about mini-modding.

No mini-modding. If you see someone breaking the rules, report it to a global moderator, rather than throwing in your own degrading comments towards the offender in question. Usually, for minor issues it's fine to subtly let the user know what they are doing is wrong, and referring them to the rules page is also an acceptable thing to do. But keep in mind that such situations are best left in the hands of the moderation team.
Click to expand...

I wrote this, and Turb said it looks good. We can't really think of anything to add if it was necessary, but yeah what does everyone else think?
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
And yet so many people continue to not understand, as so many of them don't take the time to read, and write straightaway, Lily.
 
Squawks the Parrot said:
In IRC the other day me, Turboo and some other people i think thought it would be good to have a rule about mini-modding.

No mini-modding. If you see someone breaking the rules, report it to a global moderator, rather than throwing in your own degrading comments towards the offender in question. Usually, for minor issues it's fine to subtly let the user know what they are doing is wrong, and referring them to the rules page is also an acceptable thing to do. But keep in mind that such situations are best left in the hands of the moderation team.
Click to expand...

I wrote this, and Turb said it looks good. We can't really think of anything to add if it was necessary, but yeah what does everyone else think?
Click to expand...
That looks good, but how about adding one thing about "if no moderators are online" or something
 
We're trying to discourage users from taking matters into their own hands here, so reporting it would at least ensure that a mod/s would know once they do come online.
 
OK that works
 
Squawks the Parrot said:
In IRC the other day me, Turboo and some other people i think thought it would be good to have a rule about mini-modding.

No mini-modding. If you see someone breaking the rules, report it to a global moderator, rather than throwing in your own degrading comments towards the offender in question. Usually, for minor issues it's fine to subtly let the user know what they are doing is wrong, and referring them to the rules page is also an acceptable thing to do. But keep in mind that such situations are best left in the hands of the moderation team.
Click to expand...

I wrote this, and Turb said it looks good. We can't really think of anything to add if it was necessary, but yeah what does everyone else think?
Click to expand...
i think it looks good
Diesel said:
We should all have party hats
Click to expand...
YES
 
Sorry to kind of push ideas away, but as for the post removing feature I brought up last week, wouldn't it be easier to have the post automatically edited to say "removed by author" when the Delete button is clicked? Of course, it would require some coding as well, but would be simpler.
 
Actually, it's not.
Of course it can be done by changing the MySQL Query, but remember that Porple us Upgrading the Forum at every new Version, then he forgets about this Mod, and the Mod is gone.
 
I still think this rule should be altered for users banned from the wiki and/or chat:

Do not create multiple accounts for yourself. Once you have registered an account, you must use that account only. If you wish to have a different display name, you can ask a forum moderator to change it for you. If you are unable to log into your account, (ex: because you lost your password), DO NOT create another account. Simply contact a forum Administrator on their corresponding wiki talk page. We will reset your password, then email it to you.
Click to expand...

Like, a segment should be added stating something like "If you're banned from the wiki, however, use the chat to ask a mod. If you're banned from the chat[...]". Because I mean, if someone forgets their password here but is banned on the wiki and/or chat, how will they know how to get their password changed? The rule says not to make a new account, so they'd just be banned on sight if they wanted to make a new account to tell us they forgot their password .
 
I remember one Member on another Forum, who created 8 new Accounts for himself, without having a specific reason for this.
All 9 of them got Banned, before they were Validated.
 
There already is one:
http://www.mariowiki.com/Special:BlockList
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back