Should Rare come back to Nintendo?

Should Rare come back to Nintendo?

  • Yes, Microsoft doesn't handle them that well

    Votes: 23 85.2%

  • No, I love Banjo-Kazooie Nuts and Bolts and the remake of Conker's Bad Fur Day

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Total voters
    27
Toad85 said:
Marshal Dan Troop said:
Toad85 said:
Considering the fact that Nintendo was the ones who dropped Rare in the first place, I don't see it happening.
Click to expand...
Why do you not know what your talking about Nintendo only owned 49% of rare
Click to expand...
In the corporate world, 49% is a lot.

In most cases, 49% is actually a majority.

And even if it's not in the case of Rare, Nintendo still dropped their 49%.
Click to expand...
Do you understand how useless it would be for Nintendo to own 49% of a company when the majority would be owned by a rival?
 
Damn it number my one weakness (I think the source I had forgot to take into account European sales) I will concede that point that Banjo Kazooie is a more profitable series (if done right) then Kintect Sports
 
Makoto Naegi said:
No..
Click to expand...

vgchartz is a really shitty source for modern game sales, never mind older games which weren't accuratly tracked by organisations like the NPD Group.
 
Do you have access to a better source?
 
Marshal Dan Troop said:
Toad85 said:
Marshal Dan Troop said:
Toad85 said:
Considering the fact that Nintendo was the ones who dropped Rare in the first place, I don't see it happening.
Click to expand...
Why do you not know what your talking about Nintendo only owned 49% of rare
Click to expand...
In the corporate world, 49% is a lot.

In most cases, 49% is actually a majority.

And even if it's not in the case of Rare, Nintendo still dropped their 49%.
Click to expand...
Do you understand how useless it would be for Nintendo to own 49% of a company when the majority would be owned by a rival?
Click to expand...
What I'm saying is that the % of a company is held by shareholders, not the company itself. The shareholders, for the most part, are from Rare, but the people own the stocks, not the company.

So Nintendo holds 49%. Generic McName, who let's say is CEO of Rare, holds 26%. Gaming Q. Developer, who let's say is a head designer, holds 11%. And so on.
 
Toad85 said:
Marshal Dan Troop said:
Toad85 said:
Marshal Dan Troop said:
Toad85 said:
Considering the fact that Nintendo was the ones who dropped Rare in the first place, I don't see it happening.
Click to expand...
Why do you not know what your talking about Nintendo only owned 49% of rare
Click to expand...
In the corporate world, 49% is a lot.

In most cases, 49% is actually a majority.

And even if it's not in the case of Rare, Nintendo still dropped their 49%.
Click to expand...
Do you understand how useless it would be for Nintendo to own 49% of a company when the majority would be owned by a rival?
Click to expand...
What I'm saying is that the % of a company is held by shareholders, not the company itself. The shareholders, for the most part, are from Rare, but the people own the stocks, not the company.

So Nintendo holds 49%. Generic McName, who let's say is CEO of Rare, holds 26%. Gaming Q. Developer, who let's say is a head designer, holds 11%. And so on.
Click to expand...
But that's not how it happened it was the stamper brothers had 51% and Nintendo held 49%
 
They should just give their characters back to Nintendo because they're barely using them anymore and I haven't heard anything from Conker
 
Wait you want them to give character that they own and created to Nintendo keeping in mind that Nintendo has never once claimed to own these characters.
 
I would Love Rare to comeback to Nintendo but It won't happen. I always wanted D.K to be a playable character in Mario Party again but I don't think it will happen
 
AquaYoshi said:
I would Love Rare to comeback to Nintendo but It won't happen. I always wanted D.K to be a playable character in Mario Party again but I don't think it will happen
Click to expand...

irrelevance much
 
Microsoft is barely using those characters why don't they just give them back to Nintendo if they're barely using Rare at all?
 
microsoft isnt trying to piss off fans. >_> they're trying to make money

which is what nintendo is also doing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back