Dragons-The General All Around Culminating Thread

Favorite Dragon

  • Night Fury(How To Train Your Dragon)

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • Smaug(Hobbit)

    Votes: 5 16.7%
  • Spyro(Spyro the Game)

    Votes: 4 13.3%
  • Spike( MLP)

    Votes: 3 10.0%
  • Saphira(Eragon

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • You Hate Dragons

    Votes: 3 10.0%
  • (Other Dragon)

    Votes: 9 30.0%
  • Trogdor(In Honor)

    Votes: 4 13.3%
  • Manakete( fire emblem)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    30
Don't tell me your a drgon too.
 
dragons were real in every culture before we could all communicate with one another so im p sure they were real or still are maybe
 
like there are parts of Earth uncharted yet and they might be there like Syria or Mongolia
 
Actually after watching it like fifty times in a row and cross-referencing them with things on the Internet, I think they made the arguments very compelling. Except for how they breathe fire, they made that too complicated.
 
I think dragons have traces of flint or metal in their teeth and when they breath a special gas gland ignites creating fire! Ehem, if they were real.
 
Castiel said:
Smaug said:
Have you ever read the documentary Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real?

added to my to-do list
You have to tell me what you think of it afterwards.

ernesth100 said:
I think dragons have traces of flint or metal in their teeth and when they breath a special gas gland ignites creating fire! Ehem, if they were real.
Yeah either that, or just use methane.
 
I personally find wyverns (two-legged dragons, as in the fellbeasts from LotR. generall lack scales as well) to be superior to your basic four-legged dragon. Wyverns are generally faster and more agile, and although less powerful in land combat due to their inability to swat at foes with their forelegs, wyverns are more agile in air combat because they aren't carrying so much weight in scales and legs.
 
ernesth100 said:
Methane is a gas.
I know that. It also can create powerful flames.

Dr. Javelin said:
I personally find wyverns (two-legged dragons, as in the fellbeasts from LotR. generall lack scales as well) to be superior to your basic four-legged dragon. Wyverns are generally faster and more agile, and although less powerful in land combat due to their inability to swat at foes with their forelegs, wyverns are more agile in air combat because they aren't carrying so much weight in scales and legs.
Although they are sometimes less intelligent like in Dragonriders of Pern and.....gah I can't think of the other one. It's a really obscure series. I'll figure it our when I go to my room next.
 
Dr. Javelin said:
I personally find wyverns (two-legged dragons, as in the fellbeasts from LotR. generall lack scales as well) to be superior to your basic four-legged dragon. Wyverns are generally faster and more agile, and although less powerful in land combat due to their inability to swat at foes with their forelegs, wyverns are more agile in air combat because they aren't carrying so much weight in scales and legs.
Wyerns look like charizard.
bof4-dragon-wyvern.jpg
 
oh also wyverns are better because you can promote tana from fe8 into one

upon doing so she becomes one of the best units in the game
Tana_as_a_Wyvern_Knight.JPG

ernesth100 said:
Dr. Javelin said:
I personally find wyverns (two-legged dragons, as in the fellbeasts from LotR. generall lack scales as well) to be superior to your basic four-legged dragon. Wyverns are generally faster and more agile, and although less powerful in land combat due to their inability to swat at foes with their forelegs, wyverns are more agile in air combat because they aren't carrying so much weight in scales and legs.
Wyerns look like charizard.
bof4-dragon-wyvern.jpg
No they don't. Charizard has forearms, which wyverns do not.

If you took away his arms, though, then he would basically be a wyvern. So you've got the general idea.
 
Smaug said:
I think I was confirmed to be Tana once.
Tana is such a ridiculously awesome unit in that game. I just find it great how she (and Gerik) make it to the level of the trainees in terms of awesomeness.

...

Wait, what do you mean confirmed?
 
Dr. Javelin said:
Smaug said:
I think I was confirmed to be Tana once.
Tana is such a ridiculously awesome unit in that game. I just find it great how she (and Gerik) make it to the level of the trainees in terms of awesomeness.

...

Wait, what do you mean confirmed?
I completely forgot the details except for someone saying "DragonFreak is confirmed to be Tana" or something like that. I doubt I could make it up, because I don't really know anything about Fire Emblem.
 
Back