Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Smashgoom202 said:Tom & Jerry, Looney Tunes, and all that is one thing, but kids are still very impressionable and what they see as kids does stick with them as they grow up, no matter how subtle it may be. And I don't mean in the literal sense that kids copy what they watch on TV, but in that they take what they see in the cartoons and apply it to reality. Not to metnion, Tom & Jerry were specifically meant to be entertaining. My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, while entertaining, is also meant to teach kids watching it. Isn't it better to learn WHILE being entertained? Instead of it being one or the other?Kingbowser99 said:Man, i wish that people wouldn't take the show so seriously. Though it does have morals, it's not really meant to teach anything to anyone. I mean, children watch tom and jerry often, and you don't see children running around whacking people over the heads with mallets and crap like that. I mean, it's merely just for fun. It does have messages, and children should take from these messages, but the show shouldn't be taken that seriously.
Just to say, i'm not having a go at Smashgoom202. I'm having a go at the guy who made this video, and whatever the post was on whatever forum it was.
And what makes you say this should shouldn't be taken seriously? Are you saying all of the morals in this show are bogus? Because I disagree with that, I think that most of the episodes teach very good morals. I don't understand the logic not having this show open to interpretation like other shows can.
Well I, for one, applaud that guy for taking it too seriously, because it addresses to problems of bad writing and vague lessons that can be easy to misinterpret. The fact that it's a children's program is EXACTLY why it should be picked apart and analyzed, to make sure it's okay for kids to watch without giving the wrong message, or a bad one. The lesson in that episode was really wonky, I couldn't really understand it. Not to mention, the method used to reach that conclusion was also really iffy, and something I really hated while watching the episode. ...Along with the Pinkie Sense never being mentioned or seen again.Kingbowser99 said:Smashgoom202 said:Tom & Jerry, Looney Tunes, and all that is one thing, but kids are still very impressionable and what they see as kids does stick with them as they grow up, no matter how subtle it may be. And I don't mean in the literal sense that kids copy what they watch on TV, but in that they take what they see in the cartoons and apply it to reality. Not to metnion, Tom & Jerry were specifically meant to be entertaining. My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, while entertaining, is also meant to teach kids watching it. Isn't it better to learn WHILE being entertained? Instead of it being one or the other?Kingbowser99 said:Man, i wish that people wouldn't take the show so seriously. Though it does have morals, it's not really meant to teach anything to anyone. I mean, children watch tom and jerry often, and you don't see children running around whacking people over the heads with mallets and crap like that. I mean, it's merely just for fun. It does have messages, and children should take from these messages, but the show shouldn't be taken that seriously.
Just to say, i'm not having a go at Smashgoom202. I'm having a go at the guy who made this video, and whatever the post was on whatever forum it was.
And what makes you say this should shouldn't be taken seriously? Are you saying all of the morals in this show are bogus? Because I disagree with that, I think that most of the episodes teach very good morals. I don't understand the logic not having this show open to interpretation like other shows can.
I never said they were bogus - I said that children can take alot from the lessons used in the show. All i'm trying to say is that this guy has put too much thought into one moral, and he's taken it far too seriously, like if Richard Dawkins or someone like that said it. He's trying to argue over a children's programme (and now a young adult's programme), even though it's meant to entertain and teach at the same time.
And i never said we have to chose between one or the other, and i was only using tom and jerry as an example to compare them as both cartoons.
Smashgoom202 said:Well I, for one, applaud that guy for taking it too seriously, because it addresses to problems of bad writing and vague lessons that can be easy to misinterpret. The fact that it's a children's program is EXACTLY why it should be picked apart and analyzed, to make sure it's okay for kids to watch without giving the wrong message, or a bad one. The lesson in that episode was really wonky, I couldn't really understand it. Not to mention, the method used to reach that conclusion was also really iffy, and something I really hated while watching the episode. ...Along with the Pinkie Sense never being mentioned or seen again.Kingbowser99 said:Smashgoom202 said:Tom & Jerry, Looney Tunes, and all that is one thing, but kids are still very impressionable and what they see as kids does stick with them as they grow up, no matter how subtle it may be. And I don't mean in the literal sense that kids copy what they watch on TV, but in that they take what they see in the cartoons and apply it to reality. Not to metnion, Tom & Jerry were specifically meant to be entertaining. My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, while entertaining, is also meant to teach kids watching it. Isn't it better to learn WHILE being entertained? Instead of it being one or the other?Kingbowser99 said:Man, i wish that people wouldn't take the show so seriously. Though it does have morals, it's not really meant to teach anything to anyone. I mean, children watch tom and jerry often, and you don't see children running around whacking people over the heads with mallets and crap like that. I mean, it's merely just for fun. It does have messages, and children should take from these messages, but the show shouldn't be taken that seriously.
Just to say, i'm not having a go at Smashgoom202. I'm having a go at the guy who made this video, and whatever the post was on whatever forum it was.
And what makes you say this should shouldn't be taken seriously? Are you saying all of the morals in this show are bogus? Because I disagree with that, I think that most of the episodes teach very good morals. I don't understand the logic not having this show open to interpretation like other shows can.
I never said they were bogus - I said that children can take alot from the lessons used in the show. All i'm trying to say is that this guy has put too much thought into one moral, and he's taken it far too seriously, like if Richard Dawkins or someone like that said it. He's trying to argue over a children's programme (and now a young adult's programme), even though it's meant to entertain and teach at the same time.
And i never said we have to chose between one or the other, and i was only using tom and jerry as an example to compare them as both cartoons.
...Anyway, about the new pic and clip:
I thought that thing on the far left was a flying squirrel at first... but upon closer inspection it seems to be a bat... THAT is who I want to see win, bats are awesome! As for the clip, it's great to see Winona and Owlowiscious again, and Gummy's in top performance as usual. Can't wait to see more of them, and Angel as well.
Nabber said:Yeah, I was wondering where her Pinkie Sense went. But I guess after that there weren't many things randomly falling out of the sky.
Mijzelffan said:I actually want to see that fat owl win. I mean, look at it being all fluffy ^^. Since Twilight already has an owl, it probably won't win though :/
Kingbowser99 said:I bet the show will suprise us and pick the owl.
Okay, this is becoming a more personal thing, but I was not able to get past the negative points of this episode to really enjoy it. Not just the moral or the pinkie sense, but the way Twilight reacts to all of this, and the fact that she doesn't even TRY to figure it out, but basically because a stubborn idiot who refuses to accept that the Pinkie Sense might be real after all, even though it's been proven effective numerous times. She's basically a scapegoat for "logical thinkers", even though a real logical thinker wouldn't act the way Twilight did.Kingbowser99 said:I agree, it was very iffy that she didn't have the Pinkie sense in later (or earlier) episodes. But it sure was funny. Anyway, we should stop talking about this topic before it gets out of hand.
Anyway, that promo pic will be my desktop background! :D
Northern Verve said:The 11th episode's Sypnosis!
Title: Hearth's Warming Eve
Synopsis: The six friends are in a play about the founding of Equestria for the Hearth's Warming Eve's holiday pageant.
Air Date: December 17th, 2011
Oh my god yes, a play episode. That sounds like hilarity will ensue. Also I guess it's sort of a Christmas Episode too. We also get more background on the world of Equestria. SO. MUCH. YES.
Sounds like...Northern Verve said:The 11th episode's Sypnosis!
Title: Hearth's Warming Eve
Synopsis: The six friends are in a play about the founding of Equestria for the Hearth's Warming Eve's holiday pageant.
Air Date: December 17th, 2011
Oh my god yes, a play episode. That sounds like hilarity will ensue. Also I guess it's sort of a Christmas Episode too. We also get more background on the world of Equestria. SO. MUCH. YES.