Mario Tennis Open

Baby Luigi said:
We do not know what use Camelot will make of the DLC.
Click to expand...

What kind of DLC would everybody want? I wouldn't mind revamped Mario Tennis 64/GCN stages. I really liked that floaty Mario bros stage on the n64, mostly because of the music though.
 
DLC featuring the lost characters such as Toad being playable.

To be honest, I get the feeling that Camelot will make use of it to making more costumes for the Miis. Since they're not implementing their own made characters in the game like in the past MT and MG games they made, I'd imagine that they are enjoying themselves a bit too much with the Mii customization. :(

Stages would be nice to see (like retro stages). I still like to think that having DLC characters would be nice as well (though it seems unlikely with Nintendo in general).
 
Baby Luigi said:
Lubba would be a better choice than Baby Peach IMO

I would like on her on bigger rosters and after Baby Mario/Baby Luigi is revealed.
Click to expand...
In a reply saying, the problem would be that if Lubba is one of the Lumas when lumas are involved with species problem.

Unfortunately only few rosters are big currently. It's not proper if someone would recieve inenough appearances.


FMGBASKFH said:
Please, NO. The WarioWare and Donkey Kong series should not get mixed with the Mario series. I hated when King K. Rool and Kritter along with all the Kongs appeared in Mario Super Sluggers. Dixie was fine in Superstar Baseball, but Funky in Mario Kart Wii was too much.
Click to expand...

That's up to how Nintendo think about it, whether they do think subseries characters (including Paper, Tennis, Yoshi games etc) are okay or not. They aren't Mario characters in a narrow way, or they are as they exist in the same world with Mario members.
In my thoughts, since the staff already allow it, it's a weird thing to ask them to stop it from now on. The other realistic problem is subseries don't have own spinoff line.

Koopaul said:
That's why I don't think other Kongs will be in here. Diddy is needed as DK's partner, the Luigi to his Mario. But that's about it. This isn't a big team sport so other Kongs aren't needed.
Click to expand...
In Mario's case, Luigi is the only other playable character in most main games (uh, though it's not a good thing actually), so maybe Luigi is the equal protagonist in a general view.
In DK case, the staff gave many other characters a chance to be playable since DK Country, there is no rule to tell Diddy's weight from other players, while DK is the only hero. This causes the others have needs to be playable while Wario members don't.

In Wario's case, Wario bros are the protagonists clearly, owing to that they are created before their own games appear.

I don't think it's bad to play with subseries characters, they bring diversity and value for one game. Anyway, we do know subseries characters shouldn't be too many in a Mario roster, if we only worry about other original character can't appear.
 
There you go again. No it is absolutely confirmed that Diddy is DK best buddy and sidekick. He is Mario's Luigi. Partners in crime. DK has never been paired up with anyone else but Diddy. He's especially never been paired with Candy who you are always trying to pair him with.

Diddy and DK go together like peanut butter and jelly. And you're the only one who doesn't understand this.

As for other Kongs, Dixie was there to be Diddy's partner when DK was kidnapped. According to the story Diddy didn't even want Dixie to come along! She forced her way in.

In DKC3 DK and Diddy went off to explore the Northern Kremisphere without Dixie leaving her behind to team up with Kiddy Kong.

So there you go plenty of evidence that plainly states Diddy is DK's partner.
 
Honestly, a Goomba would be better than more Kongs. Unless the kong absolutely fits the game type. I actually would find it amusing to see a Goomba playing.

Koopaul pretty much summed it up. DK and Diddy are partners. If they cared about the other characters so much they would've been in long ago.
 
Koopaul said:
No it is absolutely confirmed that Diddy is DK best buddy and sidekick. He is Mario's Luigi. Partners in crime. DK has never been paired up with anyone else but Diddy. He's especially never been paired with Candy who you are always trying to pair him with.
Click to expand...
I simply mean the setting of players used in DK series, not simply talking about who is the best partner in story.
Some of the facts are correct, while the topic of partner does nothing with the use of subeseries character in Mario spinoffs, if your point is only the partner can be the only guest character.

Natsu "Salamander" Dragneel said:
Honestly, a Goomba would be better than more Kongs. Unless the kong absolutely fits the game type. I actually would find it amusing to see a Goomba playing.
Click to expand...
If it's not going to species problem, it depends on the part of "newcomers" whom the staff determine to choose in their recent games.
 
Dorayaki said:
Koopaul said:
No it is absolutely confirmed that Diddy is DK best buddy and sidekick. He is Mario's Luigi. Partners in crime. DK has never been paired up with anyone else but Diddy. He's especially never been paired with Candy who you are always trying to pair him with.
Click to expand...
I simply mean the setting of players used in DK series, not simply talking about who is the best partner in story.
Some of the facts are correct, while the topic of partner does nothing with the use of subeseries character in Mario spinoffs, if your point is only the partner can be the only guest character.

Natsu "Salamander" Dragneel said:
Honestly, a Goomba would be better than more Kongs. Unless the kong absolutely fits the game type. I actually would find it amusing to see a Goomba playing.
Click to expand...
If it's not going to species problem, it depends on the part of "newcomers" whom the staff determine to choose in their recent games.
Click to expand...

Just stop. The point is that the only reason Diddy is there is to be DK's partner, he doesn't need two, so that means fuck off to the Other Kongs. This is a Mario game, not a Kong game. If the other Kongs were so important, they either would've made a game of their own or put them in a long time ago.
 
Natsu "Salamander" Dragneel said:
Just stop. The point is that the only reason Diddy is there is to be DK's partner, he doesn't need two, so that means *bleep* off to the Other Kongs. This is a Mario game, not a Kong game. If the other Kongs were so important, they either would've made a game of their own or put them in a long time ago.
Click to expand...
The premise would be there are DK spinoff games. Only Mario title runs regular spinoffs currently.

As the reply, if you only mean "not to" use subseries characters in Mario spinoffs, we only see how the staff decide. The topic doesn't matter with Diddy himself only.
In Brawl, despite arguing individual seats for subseries, Diddy is qualified as the second notable character. Spinoffs don't matter if rosters aren't fixed, while Smash series ask for "representives".
 
The last DK spin-off I remember was that bongo jet pack racing game. And I don't remember that turning out so well. Maybe because the only two notable DK characters are DK and Diddy. Being a Subseries, they put them with Mario because most people only care about those two.

Or in other words, Nintendo doesn't want to waste space with monkeys.
 
Natsu "Salamander" Dragneel said:
The last DK spin-off I remember was that bongo jet pack racing game. And I don't remember that turning out so well. Maybe because the only two notable DK characters are DK and Diddy. Being a Subseries, they put them with Mario because most people only care about those two.
Click to expand...
Subseries characters can't take all seats from the main title game, that's a common sense. Your point is that the staff shouldn't consider to make use of subseries in spinoffs. I wonder if some statements are your own opinions only.

DK and Wario's own companions appear only after they open their own subseries (though the staff said the old "DK" isn't the presnt one). The subseries characters have to rely on their game development, that's a difference between DK and other members.

It reminds me if you don't like Baby Peach as well, if babies belong to Yoshi series in the narrow sense.
 
Natsu "Salamander" Dragneel said:
Just stop. The point is that the only reason Diddy is there is to be DK's partner, he doesn't need two, so that means *bleep* off to the Other Kongs. This is a Mario game, not a Kong game. If the other Kongs were so important, they either would've made a game of their own or put them in a long time ago.
Click to expand...

E-X-A-C-T-L-Y.
 
Cranky Kong: Young people these days just don't have respect for the classics. I could ace you with only one arm if I were playing this lame excuse of a game.
 
Judging from that video, Yoshi and Boo are destined to be partners.

That leaves the unlockables.

Baby Peach and Luma will probably be default partners, as Dry Bowser doesn't go with either of them.

Who would be a good partner for Dry Bowser?
 
Magikrazy said:
Judging from that video, Yoshi and Boo are destined to be partners.

That leaves the unlockables.

Baby Peach and Luma will probably be default partners, as Dry Bowser doesn't go with either of them.

Who would be a good partner for Dry Bowser?
Click to expand...
Petey, petey, Petey
 
Majin Vegeta said:
Magikrazy said:
Judging from that video, Yoshi and Boo are destined to be partners.

That leaves the unlockables.

Baby Peach and Luma will probably be default partners, as Dry Bowser doesn't go with either of them.

Who would be a good partner for Dry Bowser?
Click to expand...
Petey, petey, Petey
Click to expand...
Dry Bones King and Piranha Plant King, eh?

I could see that.
 
Why would they pair Luma and Baby Peach is beyond me.

Just add Rosalina! D:
 
New Super Mario said:
Baby Luigi said:
Why would they pair Luma and Baby Peach is beyond me.

Just add Rosalina! D:
Click to expand...
Yeah, I agree, or Lubba. But Dry Bowser and Baby Peach? Unless it is Baby Peach and Yoshi, and Dry Bowser and Boo.....
Click to expand...
Yeah, and maybe add at least some of the Koopalings.
 
There is Larry Koopa, but if you want one Koopaling, you're bound to get the rest as well.
 
MarioBros2 said:
Yeah, and maybe add at least some of the Koopalings.
Click to expand...

Probably not. You need all 7 of them in a Mario game or it won't make sense

Leave them for bigger rosters or make them stage hazards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back