Xiahou Ba

Previous usernames

Loading…

This headline is amazing

Hello there.

Trump has COVID-19.

I'll take this opportunity to remind you of vital procedures to curb the spread of the virus. Please don't believe any of his lies he said about the virus, please wear a mask, please wash your hands and clean your place up, and please socially distance yourselves.

Chroma Key.

4.6 earthquake JUST struck here.

Get your flu shots, guys. Got mine today, I feel a bit woozy and fatigued as a side effect of the vaccine, but the pay-off is worth it.

You try to play 200cc Wii U Rainbow Road in Mario Kart 8 Deluxe without Smart Steering with an inward drift bike with low-handling and try tackling the first two turns without falling off.

That moment you just came back on the wiki and you saw two proposals that failed that I missed giving my own input on.

#1: Votes shouldn't require a reason accompanying them, and I think it's a nice little QoL touch that would save hassle of requiring to type a rather meaningless two letter phrase to reinforce why you're agreeing with the side you're agreeing with. Blank votes are pretty much a stealth per all, and they hold the same power as a 1000 word essay. Having users "bandwagon" on a side isn't an obvious thing to detect in the first place, and it hasn't ever been a problem: if one side has a succinct reason, people will more likely to vote for that side (and as if "per all" isn't already used as a loophole of the reason to "bandwagon" votes into one side if a group of people really want to do it; you can't read minds of other people. I agree that typing "per all" is easy, so if people want to bandwagon, they will type the magical two letter phrase to do so...and admittedly, that's something I actually did in the past, just typed "Per all" because one side was extremely popular and I didn't take the time to read all points being made). Again, we're assuming bad faith in users, and that's something we shouldn't do in the wiki.
#2: The main reason signatures were banned in voting was because some signatures broke the # parameter and flubbed up counting votes, not because they took up too much space. I still think it does look cleaner if we used the {{user|Derpmachine}} template for voting though.

Krunch's coverage on MarioWiki isn't complete: he's missing an image of his traffic cone lod model form in Diddy Kong Racing 64.

So, Redshift has an energetic sister, right?


Would she have a crush on Chroma?

I just found out about this

If you like Baby Luigi so much, why do you want to set him on fire?

AHHHH Fariy fairly oddparnts is what you look like right now. I mean look at those elbows.

my, my, my. you're up early today.

Hey, did you ever finish that baby luigi spelunky sheet? I'd really like the sheet if you did, I am starving for good mario character mods for spelunky

Ok but if you've got a shit ton of Baby Luigi characters that means someone must be the father of them all. Luigi?

Are there any more Baby Luigi OCs that I need to know about

Bro why are you sweating do you need some ice in that glass or something

Will there ever be the Year of Baby Luigi?

Is Ray going to be forever depressed or is he just going through his "Edgy" phase?

Excuse me ma'am, do you have the time to talk about our lord and savior Norville "Shaggy" Rogers?

Have you ever been to Russia?

Wow, where I live, June and July are relatively mild without needing an AC but here is when the scorching temperatures really begin.

Ok but is chroma being a dad adorable or what