Mario & Luigi: Brothership

I do admit that as often as rumors are not true, they're also true a lot too. But there's no telling if that information about the developer is accurate at this point so early on. Like, I mean even the tweeter themselves isn't sure.
 
MartinetIsBestMario said:
Yeah; In the Mario & Luigi Games;

in the Other Mario RPGs;

Bowser is the Main Antagonist in:

1. Paper Mario 64

2. Paper Mario: Sticker Star

3. Paper Mario: Color Splash

And that's why I Don't care for those as much as the Spin-off Mario games that DON'T have Bowser as the Primary Antagonist;

Games like:

I. Super Mario RPG

II. Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door

III. Super Paper Mario

IV. Paper Mario: The Origami King

V. Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga

VI. Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time

VII. Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story

VIII. Mario + Rabbids: Sparks of Hope


Even so; It's still Bowser; controlled against his will or not; Bowser as the main antagonist is STILL Bowser as the main antagonist; It still ****ing counts; and HE'S The Reason that everything bad happened in the game; Because HE'S The One who created the Black Ink!!



Honestly. . . I Wish We'd FINALLY get a Mario & Luigi game where you ALSO play as Wario & Waluigi!!
Click to expand...
Did you know Miyamoto is holding the devs at gunpoint forcing them to make Bowser the final boss
 
@MartinetIsBestMario, PLEASE stop raging about whether or not Bowser should be a villain in the spinoffs. I'm not a fan of seeing it filling the pages ABOUT THE REVIVAL OF THE BEST MARIO RPG SERIES THAT HISTORY HAS SEEN! AlphaDream is smiling down at us from Heaven, and you are belitting what can and will happen. I ENJOY Bowser being the villain, no matter the game, because it's usually interesting, like M+RKB, for instance. No one expected a
Megabug-corrupted Bowser dragon
to appear. Also, what did Kevin Afgahni and Chris Pratt do to you?
 
Last edited:
Sweetie Belle said:
Not 100% sure if this is true or not, but I've heard this rumour that Brothership is being developed by ILCA, who developed the Pokemon Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl remakes.

mynintendonews.com

Rumour: ILCA (Diamond & Pearl remakes) could be developing Mario & Luigi Brothership

One of the many surprises showcased at the recent Nintendo Direct presentation was the delightful Mario & Luigi: Brothership. As perusal Nintendo wouldn’t reveal who was developing the title.
mynintendonews.com mynintendonews.com
Click to expand...
Honestly, if that ends up being true I'll probably lose all hope in this game being good. Judging by what they did with pokemon brilliant diamond & shining pearl ILCA should never be trusted with a preexisting franchise of games again
 
SavK said:
Honestly, if that ends up being true I'll probably lose all hope in this game being good. Judging by what they did with pokemon brilliant diamond & shining pearl ILCA should never be trusted with a preexisting franchise of games again
Click to expand...
That may or may not be true that it'll turn out bad if that is the case-I just found out at least some of the former staff of AlphaDream is helping to develop the game, so we may be ok. Like, don't panic. It'll probably be fine.
 
New video from the person who claims ILCA are the developer, he makes a good case as to why it's probably them but still no actual proof yet unfortunately, as the title would seem to suggest

 
If only new game discourse was just these two statements, we'd be a heck lot happier.
 
I hope Badges make a return, more specifically ones similar to those in Bowser's Inside Story and Dream Team. Superstar Saga's and Partners in Time Badges are OK, but I like the ones you charge up and use during battle, all with various effects for several playstyles. The Battle Cards from Paper Jam were OK, but I prefer Badges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back