Why I don't care for Super Paper Mario

Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS said:
It was a different world.
Click to expand...

Already explained earlier why thats not an excuse.

And there is such a thing as being too different.
 
Yeah, when I see a FPS Mario game with gritty, dark graphics, blood and cussing, then maybe I'll believe it's "too different"

But as long as they keep with the colorful, creative world designs and keep it E-rated material, it's not too different because those are basically Mario's standards anyway.
 
Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS said:
Yeah, when I see a FPS Mario game with gritty, dark graphics, blood and cussing, then maybe I'll believe it's "too different"
Click to expand...

Relevant

1EB98AFE88B209ADE4111DEE5244BC294E1E3BEE
 
http://www.mariowiki.com/Goomba

http://www.mariowiki.com/Octoomba

http://www.mariowiki.com/Beanie

http://www.mariowiki.com/Gnip


One of these things is not like the others, one of these things doesn't belong.
 
Gnips are ----ing hideous
 
Baby Luigi said:
Gnips are ----ing hideous
Click to expand...

Its pretty much the poster child for the game's bad character designs.
 
I prefer the old Paper Mario designs for Hammer Bro and Buzzy Beetle.
Otherwise, Sticker Star had better designs.
 
I prefer probably only the Buzzy Beetles. Even then, the New Super Mario Bros. can stick with this kind of design.

Parabeetle_Sprite.png
 
Mcmadness said:
http://www.mariowiki.com/Goomba

http://www.mariowiki.com/Octoomba

http://www.mariowiki.com/Beanie

http://www.mariowiki.com/Gnip


One of these things is not like the others, one of these things doesn't belong.
Click to expand...
It fit with the established art style of the game, I don't see what is wrong with them. That thing only appeared in ONE level though, you seriously can't find a more common example? Such as the Squig family or Skellobits, both of which look cool?
 
Magikrazy said:
What the *bleep* happened to Merlee and Merluvlee?
Click to expand...
Mannnn, their Super Paper Mario designs are atrocious.
 
Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS said:
It fit with the established art style of the game, I don't see what is wrong with them. That thing only appeared in ONE level though, you seriously can't find a more common example? Such as the Squig family or Skellobits, both of which look cool?
Click to expand...

45_SquigCard.PNG


Squigs are ugly as sin
 
Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS said:
Mcmadness said:
http://www.mariowiki.com/Goomba

http://www.mariowiki.com/Octoomba

http://www.mariowiki.com/Beanie

http://www.mariowiki.com/Gnip


One of these things is not like the others, one of these things doesn't belong.
Click to expand...
It fit with the established art style of the game, I don't see what is wrong with them. That thing only appeared in ONE level though, you seriously can't find a more common example? Such as the Squig family or Skellobits, both of which look cool?
Click to expand...

The problem is that the established art style looks nothing like Mario.
 
There was no "fact" to begin with, it's all a matter of personal preference.

To be honest I do think most of the Cragnons are kinda ugly looking, but they're not important characters either. The important Cragnons are Flint Cragley and his crew, and they look absolutely great compared to the other ones.
 
So the graphics are bizarre, and the new characters are fitting, not at all strange and outcast from the Mario style.

Doesn't that kinda contradict?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back